東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies./
作者:	Basseches, Joshua A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	274 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-04A.
標題:	Public policy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28030913
ISBN:	9798664798685

Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies.
Basseches, Joshua A.

Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 274 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the absence of any significant federal policy to mitigate climate change, many (though not all) U.S. states have stepped in to fill the void. But the policies these states have adopted vary considerably in their quality. For example, California's economy-wide greenhouse gas policy was significantly stronger than Massachusetts', which was significantly stronger than Oregon's. All three states also adopted renewable portfolio standards policies that contained extraneous provisions that, using different mechanisms, shifted costs associated with the transition away from fossil fuels, toward renewable sources of electricity. The literature on state-level climate and renewable energy policy is wide-ranging, but does not adequately address the role of business interests in explaining this sort of variation in state-level policy quality. This is surprising, given that explanations for the lack of policy at the federal level often center on the power of private interests. In this dissertation, I develop a new framework that accounts for the policy preferences and political power of the full spectrum of private actors with an interest in these policies. Based on an analysis of legislative and regulatory texts, archival material, and 111 policy-focused interviews with policymakers, public interest advocates, and corporate lobbyists, I find that business actors fell into one of three categories based on their preferences regarding the content of these policies. The most politically powerful of these three categories was the investor-owned utilities, whose preferences, combined with variation in the political power of the remaining two categories across the three states, largely explain this policy variation. My findings contribute to sociological and political science debates about business power and democratic representation as well as empirical studies of state-level environmental policy.

ISBN: 9798664798685Subjects--Topical Terms:

532803
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Business power

Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies.
LDR:03248nmm a2200409 4500 001 2344115
005 20230315113006.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664798685
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28030913
035 $a AAI28030913
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Basseches, Joshua A. $3 3682852
245 1 0 $a Private Power in the U.S. States: Business Interests and the Design of State-Level Climate and Renewable Energy Policies.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 274 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Prasad, Monica;Chen, Anthony S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In the absence of any significant federal policy to mitigate climate change, many (though not all) U.S. states have stepped in to fill the void. But the policies these states have adopted vary considerably in their quality. For example, California's economy-wide greenhouse gas policy was significantly stronger than Massachusetts', which was significantly stronger than Oregon's. All three states also adopted renewable portfolio standards policies that contained extraneous provisions that, using different mechanisms, shifted costs associated with the transition away from fossil fuels, toward renewable sources of electricity. The literature on state-level climate and renewable energy policy is wide-ranging, but does not adequately address the role of business interests in explaining this sort of variation in state-level policy quality. This is surprising, given that explanations for the lack of policy at the federal level often center on the power of private interests. In this dissertation, I develop a new framework that accounts for the policy preferences and political power of the full spectrum of private actors with an interest in these policies. Based on an analysis of legislative and regulatory texts, archival material, and 111 policy-focused interviews with policymakers, public interest advocates, and corporate lobbyists, I find that business actors fell into one of three categories based on their preferences regarding the content of these policies. The most politically powerful of these three categories was the investor-owned utilities, whose preferences, combined with variation in the political power of the remaining two categories across the three states, largely explain this policy variation. My findings contribute to sociological and political science debates about business power and democratic representation as well as empirical studies of state-level environmental policy.
590 $a School code: 0163.
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Environmental law. $3 560666
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 3168311
653 $a Business power
653 $a Business preferences
653 $a Climate and energy policy
653 $a Environmental sociology
653 $a Political sociology
653 $a State politics
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0439
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Sociology. $3 1020890
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-04A.
790 $a 0163
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28030913