東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems./
作者:	Martin, Nicholas.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-11B.
標題:	Military studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28155278
ISBN:	9798728256809

Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems.
Martin, Nicholas.

Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 106 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pardee RAND Graduate School, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Dependence on space-based capabilities in support of national security missions grew dramatically at the close the 20th century. As a result of this growing dependence, the Department of Defense has made investments and developed strategies to protect national security space capabilities from threats, man-made and natural. Numerous directives point to survivability, deterrence, and mission assurance (or resilience) as the necessary elements of a protection strategy. Unfortunately, no method to assess the sufficiency of any such protection strategy has been put forth to date. This dissertation addresses that shortcoming. It lays out a novel approach that combines deterrence assessment through game theory analysis with a quantitative evaluation of survivability and mission assurance factors. As a result, tradeoffs among the elements are easier to assess. Also, this dissertation presents advanced game theory techniques that can be used to correct deficiencies. These corrective measures may take the form of modified deterrence postures better aligned with the fielded space mission architecture, or architectural updates which more appropriately underpin the desired deterrence policy. Finally, this dissertation applies the methods to two hypothetical space mission designs that are representative of today's systems to illustrate the versatility and adaptability of the methods.

ISBN: 9798728256809Subjects--Topical Terms:

2197382
Military studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deterrence

Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems.
LDR:02567nmm a2200385 4500 001 2343977
005 20220513115339.5
008 241004s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798728256809
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28155278
035 $a AAI28155278
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Martin, Nicholas. $3 3682655
245 1 0 $a Evaluating Protection Strategies for National Security Space Systems.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-11, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Alkire, Brien.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pardee RAND Graduate School, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Dependence on space-based capabilities in support of national security missions grew dramatically at the close the 20th century. As a result of this growing dependence, the Department of Defense has made investments and developed strategies to protect national security space capabilities from threats, man-made and natural. Numerous directives point to survivability, deterrence, and mission assurance (or resilience) as the necessary elements of a protection strategy. Unfortunately, no method to assess the sufficiency of any such protection strategy has been put forth to date. This dissertation addresses that shortcoming. It lays out a novel approach that combines deterrence assessment through game theory analysis with a quantitative evaluation of survivability and mission assurance factors. As a result, tradeoffs among the elements are easier to assess. Also, this dissertation presents advanced game theory techniques that can be used to correct deficiencies. These corrective measures may take the form of modified deterrence postures better aligned with the fielded space mission architecture, or architectural updates which more appropriately underpin the desired deterrence policy. Finally, this dissertation applies the methods to two hypothetical space mission designs that are representative of today's systems to illustrate the versatility and adaptability of the methods.
590 $a School code: 1492.
650 4 $a Military studies. $3 2197382
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Operations research. $3 547123
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
653 $a Deterrence
653 $a National security
653 $a Protection strategy
653 $a Game theory
653 $a Space missions
690 $a 0750
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0796
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a The Pardee RAND Graduate School. $b Policy Analysis. $3 3541875
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-11B.
790 $a 1492
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28155278