東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric./
作者:	Wood, Laura Jayne.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	261 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-07B.
標題:	Industrial engineering. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28962314
ISBN:	9798762107730

Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric.
Wood, Laura Jayne.

Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 261 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A systems approach to safety has the potential to significantly reduce patient harm events (Botney, 2008; Fowler, 2013; Wachter, 2010). However, safety professionals still struggle to develop intervention strategies that reflect substantive systems changes. To help remedy this issue, Wood and Wiegmann (2020) offered a formal definition of "systems change" and identified four system dimensions along which an intervention strategy can be evaluated to determine the level of "systems change" they reflect. A systems change hierarchy and associated rubric (SCR) for determining the extent to which a specific intervention strategy reflects a "systems change" was also provided.However, the SCR has yet to be evaluated for sources of validity or reliability evidence. The objective of this dissertation was to further the development and validation of the SCR. This objective will be met by conducting a sequential exploratory mixed methods study to meet the following aims: 1) Gather feedback from subject matter experts (SMEs) on the content and usability of the SCR, and 2) Determine the extent of inter-rater reliability that can be achieved by novices using the (revised) SCR to assess safety recommendations/intervention strategies.Aim 1 was met through the completion of an SME validation study, where SMEs were interviewed regarding the SCR for aspects of face validity, content validity, utility, and usability. Guided by these frameworks, a deductive content analysis (Neuman & Kreuger, 2000) of SME responses was conducted. This analysis identified necessary rubric revisions that culminated into a revised version of the SCR (SCR 2.0). Aim 2 was met by conducting an inter-rater reliability study with novice users applying SCR 2.0 to a series of patient safety case studies.These efforts will inform and support healthcare professionals' approach to developing systems changes needed to transform healthcare and improve patient safety.

ISBN: 9798762107730Subjects--Topical Terms:

526216
Industrial engineering.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Human factors

Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric.
LDR:03267nmm a2200397 4500 001 2343413
005 20220502104248.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798762107730
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28962314
035 $a AAI28962314
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wood, Laura Jayne. $3 3681975
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the Substantive Qualities of Safety Intervention Strategies Using a Systems Approach: Refinement and Validation of the Systems Change Rubric.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 261 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Wiegmann, Douglas A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A systems approach to safety has the potential to significantly reduce patient harm events (Botney, 2008; Fowler, 2013; Wachter, 2010). However, safety professionals still struggle to develop intervention strategies that reflect substantive systems changes. To help remedy this issue, Wood and Wiegmann (2020) offered a formal definition of "systems change" and identified four system dimensions along which an intervention strategy can be evaluated to determine the level of "systems change" they reflect. A systems change hierarchy and associated rubric (SCR) for determining the extent to which a specific intervention strategy reflects a "systems change" was also provided.However, the SCR has yet to be evaluated for sources of validity or reliability evidence. The objective of this dissertation was to further the development and validation of the SCR. This objective will be met by conducting a sequential exploratory mixed methods study to meet the following aims: 1) Gather feedback from subject matter experts (SMEs) on the content and usability of the SCR, and 2) Determine the extent of inter-rater reliability that can be achieved by novices using the (revised) SCR to assess safety recommendations/intervention strategies.Aim 1 was met through the completion of an SME validation study, where SMEs were interviewed regarding the SCR for aspects of face validity, content validity, utility, and usability. Guided by these frameworks, a deductive content analysis (Neuman & Kreuger, 2000) of SME responses was conducted. This analysis identified necessary rubric revisions that culminated into a revised version of the SCR (SCR 2.0). Aim 2 was met by conducting an inter-rater reliability study with novice users applying SCR 2.0 to a series of patient safety case studies.These efforts will inform and support healthcare professionals' approach to developing systems changes needed to transform healthcare and improve patient safety.
590 $a School code: 0262.
650 4 $a Industrial engineering. $3 526216
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
650 4 $a Health care management. $3 2122906
653 $a Human factors
653 $a Mixed methods
653 $a Patient safety
653 $a Recommendations
653 $a Systems change
653 $a Systems thinking
653 $a Intervention strategies
690 $a 0546
690 $a 0790
690 $a 0769
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Madison. $b Industrial Engineering. $3 2093809
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-07B.
790 $a 0262
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28962314