東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Supporting Students to Learn from Se...

Zhang, Qian.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors./
作者:	Zhang, Qian.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2022,
面頁冊數:	138 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-12A.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29063030
ISBN:	9798834005087

Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors.
Zhang, Qian.

Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2022 - 138 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2022.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Errors are inevitable in most learning contexts, but under the right conditions, they can be beneficial for learning. However, it is unclear how and how to support students to learn from self-generated errors. We first conducted a think-aloud study (n = 44) to investigate students' cognitive activities of self-explaining and drawing when they compared their erroneous responses with expert solutions after solving biochemistry problems. The think-aloud study provided strong evidence that self-explanations of correcting deep errors that include explaining why correct answers are correct and why incorrect answers are incorrect played a significant role in students' learning from their errors. Then, we did a follow-up experiment (n = 132) to investigate the causal, positive effects of self-explaining and drawing on students' learning from errors. Students were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions to help them learn from errors: self-explaining support only (n = 30), drawing prompts only (n = 31), drawing prompts and self-explaining support (n = 27), and a control condition with neither self-explaining support nor drawing prompts (n = 33). Consistent with the think-aloud study, students who received self-explaining support that helped them detect and correct deep errors had a significantly better conceptual understanding of non-covalent interactions than students in the control condition. However, the effects of drawing might depend on students' drawing qualities, and drawing activities without instructional support might interfere with self-explaining activities. Moreover, the experience of learning from errors had a positive effect on students' task-specific self-efficacy but not on self-efficacy in the domain.

ISBN: 9798834005087Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Drawing

Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors.
LDR:02903nmm a2200373 4500 001 2323104
005 20231010062903.5
006 m o d
007 cr#unu||||||||
008 231204s2022 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798834005087
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29063030
035 $a AAI29063030
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhang, Qian. $3 1930855
245 1 0 $a Supporting Students to Learn from Self-Generated Errors.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2022
300 $a 138 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Fiorella, Logan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2022.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Errors are inevitable in most learning contexts, but under the right conditions, they can be beneficial for learning. However, it is unclear how and how to support students to learn from self-generated errors. We first conducted a think-aloud study (n = 44) to investigate students' cognitive activities of self-explaining and drawing when they compared their erroneous responses with expert solutions after solving biochemistry problems. The think-aloud study provided strong evidence that self-explanations of correcting deep errors that include explaining why correct answers are correct and why incorrect answers are incorrect played a significant role in students' learning from their errors. Then, we did a follow-up experiment (n = 132) to investigate the causal, positive effects of self-explaining and drawing on students' learning from errors. Students were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions to help them learn from errors: self-explaining support only (n = 30), drawing prompts only (n = 31), drawing prompts and self-explaining support (n = 27), and a control condition with neither self-explaining support nor drawing prompts (n = 33). Consistent with the think-aloud study, students who received self-explaining support that helped them detect and correct deep errors had a significantly better conceptual understanding of non-covalent interactions than students in the control condition. However, the effects of drawing might depend on students' drawing qualities, and drawing activities without instructional support might interfere with self-explaining activities. Moreover, the experience of learning from errors had a positive effect on students' task-specific self-efficacy but not on self-efficacy in the domain.
590 $a School code: 0077.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
653 $a Drawing
653 $a Learning from errors
653 $a Self-efficacy
653 $a Self-explaining
653 $a Self-regulated learning
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a University of Georgia. $b Educational Psychology - PHD. $3 3642083
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-12A.
790 $a 0077
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2022
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29063030