東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanction...

Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems = a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems/ by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas.
Reminder of title:	a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
Author:	Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2023.,
Description:	viii, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Double jeopardy - European Union countries. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6
ISBN:	9783031165566

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems = a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio.

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systemsa case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /[electronic resource] :by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2023. - viii, 222 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law,v. 82524-8057 ;. - Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law ;v. 8..

Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.

The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.

ISBN: 9783031165566

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

3629192
Double jeopardy
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: KJE9698 / .E83 2023

Dewey Class. No.: 345.04094

Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems = a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU /
LDR:03479nmm a2200361 a 4500 001 2316161
003 DE-He213
005 20230123192609.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230902s2023 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783031165566 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783031165559 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-031-16556-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJE9698 $b .E83 2023
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAM $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 345.04094 $2 23
090 $a KJE9698 $b .E74 2023
100 1 $a Escobar Veas, Javier Ignacio. $3 3629190
245 1 0 $a Ne bis in idem and multiple sanctioning systems $h [electronic resource] : $b a case law study of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the EU / $c by Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2023.
300 $a viii, 222 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law, $x 2524-8057 ; $v v. 8
505 0 $a Introduction -- FIRST PART -- INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE CASE LAW REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United States -- Case Law of the Supreme Court of Canada -- Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights -- Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union -- SECOND PART -- CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE LAW OF THE ECtHR AND THE CJEU REGARDING THE LAWFULNESS OF MULTIPLE SANCTIONING SYSTEMS UNDER THE NE BIS IN IDEM -- Lawfulness of Multiple Sanctioning Systems under the Ne Bis in Idem: Four Different Approaches to Resolve the Same Problem -- THIRD PART -- RECONCEPTUALIZING THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PUNISHMENTS AND THE PROHIBITION OF MULTIPLE PROSECUTIONS -- Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation -- Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal Nature -- Reconceptualizing the Ne Bis in Idem -- FOURTH PART -- LOOKING BEYOND THE NE BIS IN IDEM: RECALLING THE PROHIBITION OF DISPROPORTIONATE SANCTIONS AND THE RIGHT TO BE TRIED WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME -- Looking Beyond the Ne Bis in Idem -- Final Remarks.
520 $a The aim of the book is to resolve the question of whether multiple sanctioning systems are contrary to the ne bis in idem under the regulation provided by Protocol 7 to the ECHR and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The first part is a comparative study regarding the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the ne bis in idem, studying the evolution and the current state of the case law of the United States Supreme Court, the Canadian Supreme Court, the Spanish Constitutional Court, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) The second part of the book critically analyses three problems with the case law of the ECtHR and the CJEU. Part three deals with reconceptualizing the prohibition of multiple punishment and the prohibition of multiple prosecutions. Finally, the fourth part addresses other possible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.
650 0 $a Double jeopardy $z European Union countries. $3 3629192
650 0 $a Sanctions, Administrative $z European Union countries. $3 3629193
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law. $3 3538685
650 2 4 $a International Criminal Law. $3 1566602
650 2 4 $a Human Rights. $3 760752
650 2 4 $a European Criminal Law. $3 3445527
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Legal studies in international, European and comparative criminal law ; $v v. 8. $3 3629191
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16556-6
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)