東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Getting Online with Generation Z: Le...

Mellman, Letha Marie.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences./
Author:	Mellman, Letha Marie.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	230 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-08A.
Subject:	Higher education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28260927
ISBN:	9798569911394

Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences.
Mellman, Letha Marie.

Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 230 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This e-Delphi study explored learning approaches, as defined by Generation Z (Gen Z) learners, in online academic settings and nonacademic settings. It also considered differences between the two panels (38 participants in each panel, representing 39 states) of learners (Academic and Nonacademic) and compared current literature-supported best practices to the learning approaches generated by participants in this study. The Academic panel participants reached consensus on six of the 56 learning approaches: (a) completing course material; (b) rely on self; (c) projects that I can choose what to do and learn material by myself; (d) search Internet; (e) ask expert; and (f) work/discuss with others in class. Additionally, two themes emerged: (1) Guidance with subthemes (a) clear expectations and (b) ask to get a response and (2) Reliance on Self. Thematic analysis of the Academic panel participant data identified two themes: (1) Guidance with subthemes (a) clear expectations and (b) ask to get a response and (2) Reliance on Self. The Nonacademic panel participants reached consensus on 10 of the 37 learning approaches: (a) search online; (b) search for online resources, which are detailed; (c) very detailed, written instructions; (d) try to learn a new skill by self; (e) projects that I can choose what to do and learn material by self; (f) visual examples of finished projects; (g) videos that show me how to do the project; (h) ask expert; (i) ask in social media group; and (j) watch video. Thematic analysis of the Nonacademic panel participant data identified two themes (1) Recommendations and (2) Search Online. The driving learning approach for the Academic panel participants was identified as seeking a guide, while the Nonacademic panel participants sought recommendations to aid them in the learning process. This study added to the limited literature on Gen Z, and offered suggestions for educators to enhance Gen Z learning experiences.

ISBN: 9798569911394Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deep learning

Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences.
LDR:03311nmm a2200469 4500 001 2285131
005 20211129123947.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569911394
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28260927
035 $a AAI28260927
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mellman, Letha Marie. $3 3564418
245 1 0 $a Getting Online with Generation Z: Learning Preferences.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 230 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Slykhuis, David A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This e-Delphi study explored learning approaches, as defined by Generation Z (Gen Z) learners, in online academic settings and nonacademic settings. It also considered differences between the two panels (38 participants in each panel, representing 39 states) of learners (Academic and Nonacademic) and compared current literature-supported best practices to the learning approaches generated by participants in this study. The Academic panel participants reached consensus on six of the 56 learning approaches: (a) completing course material; (b) rely on self; (c) projects that I can choose what to do and learn material by myself; (d) search Internet; (e) ask expert; and (f) work/discuss with others in class. Additionally, two themes emerged: (1) Guidance with subthemes (a) clear expectations and (b) ask to get a response and (2) Reliance on Self. Thematic analysis of the Academic panel participant data identified two themes: (1) Guidance with subthemes (a) clear expectations and (b) ask to get a response and (2) Reliance on Self. The Nonacademic panel participants reached consensus on 10 of the 37 learning approaches: (a) search online; (b) search for online resources, which are detailed; (c) very detailed, written instructions; (d) try to learn a new skill by self; (e) projects that I can choose what to do and learn material by self; (f) visual examples of finished projects; (g) videos that show me how to do the project; (h) ask expert; (i) ask in social media group; and (j) watch video. Thematic analysis of the Nonacademic panel participant data identified two themes (1) Recommendations and (2) Search Online. The driving learning approach for the Academic panel participants was identified as seeking a guide, while the Nonacademic panel participants sought recommendations to aid them in the learning process. This study added to the limited literature on Gen Z, and offered suggestions for educators to enhance Gen Z learning experiences.
590 $a School code: 0161.
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Multimedia communications. $3 590562
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Demography. $3 614991
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
653 $a Deep learning
653 $a Delphi Method
653 $a Generation Z
653 $a Learning approaches
653 $a Online learning
653 $a Internet
653 $a Written instructions
653 $a Online resources
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0558
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0938
710 2 $a University of Northern Colorado. $b Educational Technology. $3 1683797
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-08A.
790 $a 0161
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28260927