東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity...

Martinez, Angely.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States./
Author:	Martinez, Angely.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	203 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-01A.
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28418486
ISBN:	9798516956980

As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States.
Martinez, Angely.

As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 203 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

What explains de facto states that do not pursue statehood? Why do we see examples of unrecognized states pushing for reintegration after a period of time? Why do some de facto states seem content with the status quo?Previous examination of de facto state strategies highlighted the role that the international system plays in granting independence. For the most part, de facto states, by default secessionist movements who have sundered from the parent state, are unlikely to be granted independence by the very system which holds a taboo against secession. The exceptions to this came after a long time of sustained campaigning, in addition to gross human rights violations. Current explanations for de facto states still in limbo hedge on other states playing the most important role. These explanations are incomplete. For de facto states that have signaled their desire for reintegration or the states, it is useful to examine not only internal dynamics within the unrecognized state, but also the de facto state - parent state dynamic.In this dissertation, I analyze the role that relative state capacity plays in shaping preferences for de facto states, whether that be for reintegration, status quo, or independence. My dissertation contributes to the burgeoning literature on de facto statehood in a variety of ways. First, I contribute by challenging the idea that unrecognized states automatically prefer independence. My case studies point to a variety of preferences that exist along the spectrum of de facto states. Northern Cyprus shows an example of an established de facto state that pushed for reintegration with the very parent state that assured it did not have a role in the international system. The case of Taiwan displays an example of an economic powerhouse that treads the line of status quo acceptance, and the role that their state capacity relative to the parent state plays in that. Finally, Somaliland is a case of a de facto state preferring independence, despite having no patron state and an uphill climb to establish adequate state building.Second, I present a theoretical framework that incorporates state capacity of the de facto state and the parent state. Specifically, I lay out that the balance of state capacity between both parties shapes preferences for either reintegration, status quo, or independence. Furthermore, state capacity is dissected down into three constituent parts: military capacity, economic capacity, and administrative capacity. I directly compare the military, economic, and administrative capacity of each de facto-parent state dyad, using numerous indicators. By systematically comparing the state capacity of de facto states and parent states, my dissertation offers an additional and necessary examination into de facto states and their outlook towards their sovereignty.

ISBN: 9798516956980Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

De facto states

As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States.
LDR:03945nmm a2200337 4500 001 2284898
005 20211124093249.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516956980
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28418486
035 $a AAI28418486
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Martinez, Angely. $3 3564110
245 1 0 $a As a Matter De Facto: State Capacity Dynamics and their Role in Shaping Sovereignty for Unrecognized States.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 203 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Griffiths, Ryan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Syracuse University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a What explains de facto states that do not pursue statehood? Why do we see examples of unrecognized states pushing for reintegration after a period of time? Why do some de facto states seem content with the status quo?Previous examination of de facto state strategies highlighted the role that the international system plays in granting independence. For the most part, de facto states, by default secessionist movements who have sundered from the parent state, are unlikely to be granted independence by the very system which holds a taboo against secession. The exceptions to this came after a long time of sustained campaigning, in addition to gross human rights violations. Current explanations for de facto states still in limbo hedge on other states playing the most important role. These explanations are incomplete. For de facto states that have signaled their desire for reintegration or the states, it is useful to examine not only internal dynamics within the unrecognized state, but also the de facto state - parent state dynamic.In this dissertation, I analyze the role that relative state capacity plays in shaping preferences for de facto states, whether that be for reintegration, status quo, or independence. My dissertation contributes to the burgeoning literature on de facto statehood in a variety of ways. First, I contribute by challenging the idea that unrecognized states automatically prefer independence. My case studies point to a variety of preferences that exist along the spectrum of de facto states. Northern Cyprus shows an example of an established de facto state that pushed for reintegration with the very parent state that assured it did not have a role in the international system. The case of Taiwan displays an example of an economic powerhouse that treads the line of status quo acceptance, and the role that their state capacity relative to the parent state plays in that. Finally, Somaliland is a case of a de facto state preferring independence, despite having no patron state and an uphill climb to establish adequate state building.Second, I present a theoretical framework that incorporates state capacity of the de facto state and the parent state. Specifically, I lay out that the balance of state capacity between both parties shapes preferences for either reintegration, status quo, or independence. Furthermore, state capacity is dissected down into three constituent parts: military capacity, economic capacity, and administrative capacity. I directly compare the military, economic, and administrative capacity of each de facto-parent state dyad, using numerous indicators. By systematically comparing the state capacity of de facto states and parent states, my dissertation offers an additional and necessary examination into de facto states and their outlook towards their sovereignty.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Population. $3 518693
650 4 $a State failure. $3 3564111
650 4 $a Piracy. $3 2002701
650 4 $a Democratization. $3 570502
650 4 $a Statehood. $3 3564112
650 4 $a Referendums. $3 3564113
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Politics. $3 685427
650 4 $a International law. $3 560784
650 4 $a Diplomatic & consular services. $3 3564114
650 4 $a Sovereignty. $3 571951
650 4 $a Dissertations & theses. $3 3560115
650 4 $a Political conventions. $3 1007714
650 4 $a Archives & records. $3 3558980
650 4 $a Democracy. $3 519163
650 4 $a Expenditures. $3 3556049
650 4 $a Civil liberties. $3 3564115
650 4 $a Case studies. $2 itrt $3 996239
653 $a De facto states
653 $a State capacity
653 $a Unrecognized states
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0616
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $b Political Science. $3 1681968
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-01A.
790 $a 0659
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28418486