東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Basis for Judicial Review in the...

Mahmood, Oday Talal.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings = = أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings =/
Reminder of title:	أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام.
Author:	Mahmood, Oday Talal.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	200 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-08A.
Subject:	Law. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13903932
ISBN:	9781392604441

The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings = = أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام.
Mahmood, Oday Talal.

The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings =أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 200 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.

Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation concerns Article 2 of the Iraqi Constitution of 2005, which states that Iraq is a modern Islamic constitutional democracy. The Article contains what is commonly referred to as a "repugnancy clause," which prohibits the enactment of any law that is contrary to Islam's settled rulings, the principles of democracy, and the rights guaranteed in the Constitution. The repugnancy clause allows the constitutional court to invalidate laws that violate the constitution and uphold laws that do not. Currently, the Iraqi Federal Supreme Court's method for determining whether or not a particular law is repugnant to the Constitution and Islamic settled rulings as per Article 2 is inconsistent and arbitrary. The core question in this dissertation is: What is the best way to successfully implement the repugnancy Clause of the Constitution of Iraq? I propose an approach that focuses on the classical Islamic concept of the Maqasid, an Arabic word that means intent, purpose, or objectives of Sharia. This approach will also fulfill the two other main purposes of Article 2 referred to above, which are to ensure that the law is also consistent with the principles of democracy on the one hand and the principles of human rights on the other hand.

ISBN: 9781392604441Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Democracy

The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings = = أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام.
LDR:04556nmm a2200385 4500 001 2284503
005 20211123073333.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392604441
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13903932
035 $a AAI13903932
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mahmood, Oday Talal. $3 3563673
245 1 4 $a The Basis for Judicial Review in the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq: Mediating between Democracy and Human Rights through Islam's Settled Rulings = $b أساس المراجعة القضائية في المحكمة الفدرالية العليا في العراق: التوسط بين الديمقراطية وحقوق الإنسان من خلال ثوابت احكام الاسلام.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 200 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Hamoudi, Haider A.
502 $a Thesis (S.J.D.)--University of Pittsburgh, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation concerns Article 2 of the Iraqi Constitution of 2005, which states that Iraq is a modern Islamic constitutional democracy. The Article contains what is commonly referred to as a "repugnancy clause," which prohibits the enactment of any law that is contrary to Islam's settled rulings, the principles of democracy, and the rights guaranteed in the Constitution. The repugnancy clause allows the constitutional court to invalidate laws that violate the constitution and uphold laws that do not. Currently, the Iraqi Federal Supreme Court's method for determining whether or not a particular law is repugnant to the Constitution and Islamic settled rulings as per Article 2 is inconsistent and arbitrary. The core question in this dissertation is: What is the best way to successfully implement the repugnancy Clause of the Constitution of Iraq? I propose an approach that focuses on the classical Islamic concept of the Maqasid, an Arabic word that means intent, purpose, or objectives of Sharia. This approach will also fulfill the two other main purposes of Article 2 referred to above, which are to ensure that the law is also consistent with the principles of democracy on the one hand and the principles of human rights on the other hand.
520 $a تتعلق هذه الاطروحة بالمادة 2 من الدستور العراقي لعام 2005 ، والتي تنص على أن العراق دولة ديمقراطية إسلامية دستورية حديثة. تحتوي هذه المادة على ما يشار إليه عادة باسم "بند التناقض" ، الذي يحظر سن أي قانون مخالف لأحكام الإسلام المستقرة ، ومبادئ الديمقراطية ، والحقوق المكفولة في الدستور. وبالتالي , بطلان القوانين التي تنتهك الدستور واقرار لقوانين التي لا تنتهكه. في الوقت الحالي ، فإن طريقة المحكمة الاتحادية العليا لتحديد ما إذا كان قانونًا معينًا متناقضا مع الدستور وللأحكام الشرعية الإسلامية وفقًا للمادة 2 ، غير منسجمة وغير مستقرة . السؤال الجوهري في هذه الأطروحة هو: ما هي أفضل طريقة لاعمال بند التناقض في الدستور العراقي بنجاح؟ هذه الاطروحة أقترحت نهجًا يركز على المفهوم الإسلامي الكلاسيكي وهو ما يعرف بمقاصد الشريعة ، وهي كلمة عربية تعني القصد أو الغرض أو أهداف الشريعة الإسلامية - سوف يستحضرهذا النهج العنصرين الرئيسيين الآخرين للمادة 2 المشار إليها أعلاه ، وهما ضمان ان القانون يتوافق أيضًا مع مبادئ الديمقراطية من ناحية ومبادئ حقوق الإنسان من ناحية أخرى.
590 $a School code: 0178.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Middle Eastern studies. $3 3168421
653 $a Democracy
653 $a Human rights
653 $a Iraqi Constitution
653 $a Judicial review
653 $a Maqasid
653 $a Repugnancy clause
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0555
710 2 $a University of Pittsburgh. $b School of Law. $3 3563674
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-08A.
790 $a 0178
791 $a S.J.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13903932