東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Comparison of the Transversus Abdo...

Talbert, Jessica.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study./
Author:	Talbert, Jessica.
other author:	Brands, Theresa
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	72 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-01A.
Subject:	Nursing. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498185
ISBN:	9798516979019

A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study.
Talbert, Jessica.

A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 72 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Webster University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Introduction: A hysterectomy is the surgical removal of a uterus that can result in subjects experiencing both visceral and somatic pain. In relation to the ongoing opioid crisis, postoperative pain management is a major challenge for practitioners. Opioids are effective in managing varying levels of pain but are associated with significant side effects requiring judicious prescription. Recent pain management guidelines emphasize the importance of using regional anesthesia as part of an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a posterior cul de sac catheter versus a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in decreasing postoperative opioid consumption for subjects undergoing a laparoscopic robotic hysterectomy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 56 medical charts was conducted for subjects who underwent a laparoscopic robotic hysterectomy at Phelps Health between June 2018 and November 2019. Subjects were divided into two groups. With an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implemented to maintain homogeneity between groups, the control group received a TAP block preoperatively, whereas the experimental group received a posterior cul de sac catheter in the perioperative period. The primary outcome measured was opioid consumption (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes measured include subject demographics, opioid consumption intraoperatively, total opioid consumption on postoperative day (POD) 0, total opioid consumption throughout the entire hospital stay, incidence of nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain scores at various time intervals, hospital length of stay, thirty-day emergency department (ED) visit rates, and thirty-day hospital readmission rates. Results: Statistical analysis using an independent samples t-test confirmed that subjects who received a posterior cul de sac catheter (experimental group; n=41) consumed significantly less opioids (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the PACU in comparison to subjects who received a TAP block (control group; n=15) (2.879 ± 2.730 mg versus 7.633 ± 7.324 mg respectively; p value 0.026). Discussion: In summary, statistical analysis confirmed that the experimental group had decreased: opioid consumption (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the PACU, on POD 0, and throughout the entire hospital stay; decreased postoperative pain scores at 30-minutes, 45-minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2.5 hours, on POD 1 and POD 2; hospital length of stay; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; 30-day postoperative ED visit rates, and 30-day hospital readmission rates. No statistical significance was found between groups when comparing intraoperative opioid consumption due to adherence to set forth ERAS protocols.

ISBN: 9798516979019Subjects--Topical Terms:

528444
Nursing.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Acute pain

A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study.
LDR:04327nmm a2200481 4500 001 2283652
005 20211115071522.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798516979019
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28498185
035 $a AAI28498185
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Talbert, Jessica. $3 3562645
245 1 0 $a A Comparison of the Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block vs. Posterior Cul de Sac Catheter in Laparoscopic Robotic Hysterectomies: Pilot Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 72 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Burns, Michael.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Webster University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Introduction: A hysterectomy is the surgical removal of a uterus that can result in subjects experiencing both visceral and somatic pain. In relation to the ongoing opioid crisis, postoperative pain management is a major challenge for practitioners. Opioids are effective in managing varying levels of pain but are associated with significant side effects requiring judicious prescription. Recent pain management guidelines emphasize the importance of using regional anesthesia as part of an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a posterior cul de sac catheter versus a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in decreasing postoperative opioid consumption for subjects undergoing a laparoscopic robotic hysterectomy. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 56 medical charts was conducted for subjects who underwent a laparoscopic robotic hysterectomy at Phelps Health between June 2018 and November 2019. Subjects were divided into two groups. With an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol implemented to maintain homogeneity between groups, the control group received a TAP block preoperatively, whereas the experimental group received a posterior cul de sac catheter in the perioperative period. The primary outcome measured was opioid consumption (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes measured include subject demographics, opioid consumption intraoperatively, total opioid consumption on postoperative day (POD) 0, total opioid consumption throughout the entire hospital stay, incidence of nausea and vomiting, postoperative pain scores at various time intervals, hospital length of stay, thirty-day emergency department (ED) visit rates, and thirty-day hospital readmission rates. Results: Statistical analysis using an independent samples t-test confirmed that subjects who received a posterior cul de sac catheter (experimental group; n=41) consumed significantly less opioids (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the PACU in comparison to subjects who received a TAP block (control group; n=15) (2.879 ± 2.730 mg versus 7.633 ± 7.324 mg respectively; p value 0.026). Discussion: In summary, statistical analysis confirmed that the experimental group had decreased: opioid consumption (morphine equivalent (mg)) in the PACU, on POD 0, and throughout the entire hospital stay; decreased postoperative pain scores at 30-minutes, 45-minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours, 2.5 hours, on POD 1 and POD 2; hospital length of stay; incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting; 30-day postoperative ED visit rates, and 30-day hospital readmission rates. No statistical significance was found between groups when comparing intraoperative opioid consumption due to adherence to set forth ERAS protocols.
590 $a School code: 0813.
650 4 $a Nursing. $3 528444
650 4 $a Surgery. $3 707153
650 4 $a Obstetrics. $3 634501
650 4 $a Womens health. $3 3562508
650 4 $a Pain management. $3 3562647
650 4 $a Bladder. $3 3562648
650 4 $a Catheters. $3 3562649
650 4 $a Histamine. $3 3241635
650 4 $a Hospitals. $3 616081
650 4 $a Families & family life. $3 3422406
650 4 $a Surgical outcomes. $3 3562650
650 4 $a Abdomen. $2 bidex $3 876514
650 4 $a Ligaments. $3 3562651
650 4 $a Ventilation. $3 776587
650 4 $a Drug dosages. $3 3557732
650 4 $a Robotics. $3 519753
650 4 $a Analgesics. $3 894832
650 4 $a Proteins. $3 558769
650 4 $a Cardiac arrhythmia. $3 3562652
650 4 $a Length of stay. $3 3560751
650 4 $a Hypotheses. $3 3560118
650 4 $a Hysterectomy. $3 3296701
650 4 $a Cartilage. $3 924011
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Nervous system. $3 672432
650 4 $a Spinal cord. $3 895443
650 4 $a Disease control. $3 3562653
653 $a Acute pain
653 $a Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs
653 $a Regional anesthesia
653 $a Readmission
653 $a Opioid consumption
653 $a Length of stay
653 $a Pain score
653 $a Post-operative nausea and vomiting
653 $a PONV
653 $a Pain management
653 $a Gynocology
653 $a Hysterectomy
690 $a 0569
690 $a 0576
690 $a 0380
690 $a 0771
690 $a 0389
700 1 0 $a Brands, Theresa $e joint author $3 3562646
710 2 $a Webster University. $b Nurse Anesthesia. $3 3276578
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-01A.
790 $a 0813
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28498185