東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Effects of Multilinguistic Word Stud...

Leelman, Maryellen A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal./
Author:	Leelman, Maryellen A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
Description:	240 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-08A.
Subject:	Reading instruction. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28314167
ISBN:	9798569959334

Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal.
Leelman, Maryellen A.

Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 240 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Boston University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A nonrandomized quasi-experimental, mixed-method double pretest-posttest design was used to compare the effects of a multilinguistic word study model of instruction -RAVE-O program (Wolf, Miller, & Donnelly, 2000) - in comparison with a phonics word study model of instruction - Fountas and Pinnell Phonics Lessons - Letters, words, and how they work (Pinnell & Fountas, 2003). Repeated measures data were collected over 12 weeks, reflecting three points in time (i.e., Time 1: Fall pretest - baseline to Time 2: April pretest to Time 3: June posttest) to examine 50 first-grade students' growth in word reading and spelling. Additionally, the linguistic patterns of spelling errors were examined across approaches.It was hypothesized that first-grade students who received explicit multilinguistic word study instruction would demonstrate greater literacy achievement (i.e., word reading and spelling) than first-grade students receiving traditional phonics word study instruction. It was also hypothesized that the linguistic pattern of spelling errors (i.e., phonological, orthographic, transpositions, and morphological) would differ as a function of the instructional approach. Neither proposed hypothesis was confirmed in this study.Data showed an overarching pattern of achievement in which, for most outcomes, children demonstrated growth in word reading and spelling skills regardless of the word study approach. More extensive examination of spelling (i.e., correct words, feature points, and inflected endings) revealed significant growth over time for all spelling outcome measures - including morphological comprehension and use, regardless of the word study approach. The linguistic categories of spelling error types on multimorphemic words from least to most were transposition, orthographic image, phonological, orthographic, with the most frequent errors being morphological errors. Students in both groups demonstrated significant growth from pre- to post-testing on their ability to provide the correct affix (i.e., prefix or suffix) when spelling multimorphemic words (i.e., unable, return, giving) - even if they were unable to spell the word correctly.While neither proposed hypothesis was confirmed in this study, the results showed that multilinguistic word study instruction could produce comparable results to traditional phonics word study instruction. This study also reinforced that children in the primary grades can access and use varying linguistic resources and processes, including higher-level morphological knowledge in their reading and spelling development. Furthermore, this study supported the position that examining instruction in the primary grades that incorporates metalinguistic information and a greater understanding of oral and written language versus waiting until the upper grades warrant further examination.

ISBN: 9798569959334Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Multilinguistic word study model of instruction

Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal.
LDR:04357nmm a2200469 4500 001 2281979
005 20210927083510.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798569959334
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28314167
035 $a AAI28314167
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Leelman, Maryellen A. $0 (orcid)0000-0003-4414-0948 $3 3560694
245 1 0 $a Effects of Multilinguistic Word Study Instruction on Word Reading and Spelling in the First Grade: Increasing Metalinguistic Knowledge as an Instructional Goal.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 240 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Paratore, Jeanne R.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Boston University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A nonrandomized quasi-experimental, mixed-method double pretest-posttest design was used to compare the effects of a multilinguistic word study model of instruction -RAVE-O program (Wolf, Miller, & Donnelly, 2000) - in comparison with a phonics word study model of instruction - Fountas and Pinnell Phonics Lessons - Letters, words, and how they work (Pinnell & Fountas, 2003). Repeated measures data were collected over 12 weeks, reflecting three points in time (i.e., Time 1: Fall pretest - baseline to Time 2: April pretest to Time 3: June posttest) to examine 50 first-grade students' growth in word reading and spelling. Additionally, the linguistic patterns of spelling errors were examined across approaches.It was hypothesized that first-grade students who received explicit multilinguistic word study instruction would demonstrate greater literacy achievement (i.e., word reading and spelling) than first-grade students receiving traditional phonics word study instruction. It was also hypothesized that the linguistic pattern of spelling errors (i.e., phonological, orthographic, transpositions, and morphological) would differ as a function of the instructional approach. Neither proposed hypothesis was confirmed in this study.Data showed an overarching pattern of achievement in which, for most outcomes, children demonstrated growth in word reading and spelling skills regardless of the word study approach. More extensive examination of spelling (i.e., correct words, feature points, and inflected endings) revealed significant growth over time for all spelling outcome measures - including morphological comprehension and use, regardless of the word study approach. The linguistic categories of spelling error types on multimorphemic words from least to most were transposition, orthographic image, phonological, orthographic, with the most frequent errors being morphological errors. Students in both groups demonstrated significant growth from pre- to post-testing on their ability to provide the correct affix (i.e., prefix or suffix) when spelling multimorphemic words (i.e., unable, return, giving) - even if they were unable to spell the word correctly.While neither proposed hypothesis was confirmed in this study, the results showed that multilinguistic word study instruction could produce comparable results to traditional phonics word study instruction. This study also reinforced that children in the primary grades can access and use varying linguistic resources and processes, including higher-level morphological knowledge in their reading and spelling development. Furthermore, this study supported the position that examining instruction in the primary grades that incorporates metalinguistic information and a greater understanding of oral and written language versus waiting until the upper grades warrant further examination.
590 $a School code: 0017.
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 2122799
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a Multilinguistic word study model of instruction
653 $a Spelling errors
653 $a Linguistic patterns
653 $a Literacy achievement
653 $a Word study instructions
653 $a Student achievement
653 $a Written language
653 $a Upper grades
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0727
710 2 $a Boston University. $b Education SED. $3 3281701
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-08A.
790 $a 0017
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28314167