東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationship...

Rogers, Jaidelynn.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction./
Author:	Rogers, Jaidelynn.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	105 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-04.
Subject:	Psychology. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28023057
ISBN:	9798678161246

LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction.
Rogers, Jaidelynn.

LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 105 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Individuals with LGBTQ+ identities face discrimination and bigotry, components of their minority status stress, often on a daily basis (Meyer, 2003). Elevated levels of minority stress have been negatively associated with relationship satisfaction (e.g. Rostosky, 2007), such that as minority stress increases, relationship satisfaction often decreases as well. This is an examination of the relationship between general stress, identity-related stress, minority stress, and relationship satisfaction for sexual/gender minority and heterosexual, cisgender individuals who were currently in couple relationships lasting 6 months or longer. All participants completed the Romantic Perceptions Survey, Gender Relations Scale, and Daily Hassles Scale - Short Form. The LGBTQ+ participants also completed the LGBT Minority Stress Measure. I conducted t-test comparisons to examine group differences between heterosexual, cisgender participants and LGBTQ+ participants on relationship satisfaction, identity-related stress, and general stress. The LGBTQ+ and participants exhibited significantly higher levels of relationship satisfaction, general stress, and self-rated identity-related stress than did heterosexual, cisgender participants. I also conducted two hierarchical linear regressions to determine how general stress and identity related stress impacted relationship satisfaction for heterosexual, cisgender participants, and how general stress, identity related stress, and minority stress impacted relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ couples. Results of the hierarchical linear regressions were interpreted and found that general and self-rated identity-related stressors in combination predicted relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ participants, and general stress alone best predicted relationship satisfaction for heterosexual, cisgender participants. Specific minority status stress did not further contribute to the explanation of relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ participants. Results are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice.

ISBN: 9798678161246Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Couples therapy

LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction.
LDR:03277nmm a2200385 4500 001 2279922
005 20210823091415.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798678161246
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28023057
035 $a AAI28023057
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Rogers, Jaidelynn. $3 3558410
245 1 0 $a LGBTQ+ and Heterosexual Relationships: Comparing Different Types of Stress and Relationship Satisfaction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 105 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.
500 $a Advisor: Chwalisz, Kathleen.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Individuals with LGBTQ+ identities face discrimination and bigotry, components of their minority status stress, often on a daily basis (Meyer, 2003). Elevated levels of minority stress have been negatively associated with relationship satisfaction (e.g. Rostosky, 2007), such that as minority stress increases, relationship satisfaction often decreases as well. This is an examination of the relationship between general stress, identity-related stress, minority stress, and relationship satisfaction for sexual/gender minority and heterosexual, cisgender individuals who were currently in couple relationships lasting 6 months or longer. All participants completed the Romantic Perceptions Survey, Gender Relations Scale, and Daily Hassles Scale - Short Form. The LGBTQ+ participants also completed the LGBT Minority Stress Measure. I conducted t-test comparisons to examine group differences between heterosexual, cisgender participants and LGBTQ+ participants on relationship satisfaction, identity-related stress, and general stress. The LGBTQ+ and participants exhibited significantly higher levels of relationship satisfaction, general stress, and self-rated identity-related stress than did heterosexual, cisgender participants. I also conducted two hierarchical linear regressions to determine how general stress and identity related stress impacted relationship satisfaction for heterosexual, cisgender participants, and how general stress, identity related stress, and minority stress impacted relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ couples. Results of the hierarchical linear regressions were interpreted and found that general and self-rated identity-related stressors in combination predicted relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ participants, and general stress alone best predicted relationship satisfaction for heterosexual, cisgender participants. Specific minority status stress did not further contribute to the explanation of relationship satisfaction for LGBTQ+ participants. Results are discussed in terms of implications for research and practice.
590 $a School code: 0209.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a LGBTQ studies. $3 2122706
650 4 $a Individual & family studies. $3 2122770
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
653 $a Couples therapy
653 $a Minority stress
653 $a Relationship satisfaction
653 $a Sexual orientation
653 $a Stress
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0628
690 $a 0492
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. $b Psychology. $3 1031026
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-04.
790 $a 0209
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28023057