東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

A Comparison of Two Types of Remote ...

Zhu, Jing.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity./
Author:	Zhu, Jing.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	153 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-04B.
Subject:	Special education. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13814759
ISBN:	9781085778732

A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity.
Zhu, Jing.

A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 153 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Iowa, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Treatment integrity has a direct impact on early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) outcomes for children with autism. Research suggests that providing feedback can improve treatment integrity in EIBI. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two remote feedback methods, videoconference feedback and email feedback, on treatment integrity. Participants included six teachers who were providing EIBI to children with autism in China. Using a single-case alternating treatment design, each feedback method was associated with a specific teaching procedure, either discrete trial training or incidental teaching. The teachers implemented the two teaching procedures daily but only received feedback during intervention. Results showed that videoconference feedback produced faster mastery of the teaching procedures and better treatment integrity sustainability after the intervention was removed than email feedback. Treatment integrity deterioration was observed during maintenance and follow up. Results of generalization were mixed. In social validity evaluations, teachers expressed preference of videoconference feedback over email feedback in terms of acceptance and effectiveness of the intervention, but they considered email feedback a more efficient use of their time.

ISBN: 9781085778732Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Autism

A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity.
LDR:02537nmm a2200409 4500 001 2279811
005 20210823091349.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085778732
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13814759
035 $a AAI13814759
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhu, Jing. $3 2105695
245 1 0 $a A Comparison of Two Types of Remote Performance Feedback on Treatment Integrity.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 153 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Bruhn, Allison.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Iowa, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Treatment integrity has a direct impact on early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) outcomes for children with autism. Research suggests that providing feedback can improve treatment integrity in EIBI. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two remote feedback methods, videoconference feedback and email feedback, on treatment integrity. Participants included six teachers who were providing EIBI to children with autism in China. Using a single-case alternating treatment design, each feedback method was associated with a specific teaching procedure, either discrete trial training or incidental teaching. The teachers implemented the two teaching procedures daily but only received feedback during intervention. Results showed that videoconference feedback produced faster mastery of the teaching procedures and better treatment integrity sustainability after the intervention was removed than email feedback. Treatment integrity deterioration was observed during maintenance and follow up. Results of generalization were mixed. In social validity evaluations, teachers expressed preference of videoconference feedback over email feedback in terms of acceptance and effectiveness of the intervention, but they considered email feedback a more efficient use of their time.
590 $a School code: 0096.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 3172312
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 543687
653 $a Autism
653 $a Performance feedback
653 $a Treatment integrity
653 $a Early intensive behavioral intervention
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a The University of Iowa. $b Teaching & Learning. $3 1673400
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-04B.
790 $a 0096
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13814759