東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Linguistic Achievement of English La...

Lawrence, Johnny R., Jr.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction./
作者:	Lawrence, Johnny R., Jr.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	230 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-07A.
標題:	Secondary education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27735250
ISBN:	9781392740460

Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction.
Lawrence, Johnny R., Jr.

Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 230 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this quantitative causal-comparative study is to explore if or to what extent instructions involving a student response system, peer instruction, and a combination of these factors affect the language proficiency of low-performing 9th-grade ELL students within the southeastern region of the United States. Three research questions were used to examine the following: (a) The effect of SRS on linguistic performance, (b) the effect of PI on linguistic performance as theoretically based upon Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, and (c) the interaction between SRS usage and PI as theoretically based on Distribution Cognition Theory. A two-way ANOVA and interaction contrast analysis were performed to analyze data associated with a convenience sample of 227 low-performing 9th-grade ELL students. Survey responses of educators were hierarchically analyzed to determine their form of instruction. The WIDA-ACCESS, changes in pre- and post-test scores, was analyzed to assess the linguistic progress of ELL students. The two-way ANOVA results showed no significance in SRS exposure, F (1, 223) = .552, p = .458, partial η2 = .002, significance in PI exposure, F (1, 223) = 70.638, p = .000, partial η2 = .241, and significant interaction between SRS and PI exposure, F (1, 223) = 15.802, p = .000, partial η2 = .066. Confirmation of the significance in interaction results was obtained by results from the interaction contrast analysis showing a difference between the difference of .210, 99% CI [.073 to .347], p = .000.

ISBN: 9781392740460Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122779
Secondary education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Distribution cognition theory

Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction.
LDR:02788nmm a2200385 4500 001 2279378
005 20210817110123.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392740460
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27735250
035 $a AAI27735250
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lawrence, Johnny R., Jr. $3 3557827
245 1 0 $a Linguistic Achievement of English Language Learners through Strategic Instruction.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 230 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-07, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Zientek, Kathy.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this quantitative causal-comparative study is to explore if or to what extent instructions involving a student response system, peer instruction, and a combination of these factors affect the language proficiency of low-performing 9th-grade ELL students within the southeastern region of the United States. Three research questions were used to examine the following: (a) The effect of SRS on linguistic performance, (b) the effect of PI on linguistic performance as theoretically based upon Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, and (c) the interaction between SRS usage and PI as theoretically based on Distribution Cognition Theory. A two-way ANOVA and interaction contrast analysis were performed to analyze data associated with a convenience sample of 227 low-performing 9th-grade ELL students. Survey responses of educators were hierarchically analyzed to determine their form of instruction. The WIDA-ACCESS, changes in pre- and post-test scores, was analyzed to assess the linguistic progress of ELL students. The two-way ANOVA results showed no significance in SRS exposure, F (1, 223) = .552, p = .458, partial η2 = .002, significance in PI exposure, F (1, 223) = 70.638, p = .000, partial η2 = .241, and significant interaction between SRS and PI exposure, F (1, 223) = 15.802, p = .000, partial η2 = .066. Confirmation of the significance in interaction results was obtained by results from the interaction contrast analysis showing a difference between the difference of .210, 99% CI [.073 to .347], p = .000.
590 $a School code: 1582.
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
650 4 $a English as a second language--ESL. $3 3423990
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
653 $a Distribution cognition theory
653 $a English language learners
653 $a Linguistic performance
653 $a Peer instruction
653 $a Student response system
653 $a Vygotsky's sociocultural theory
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Grand Canyon University. $b College of Doctoral Studies. $3 2097618
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-07A.
790 $a 1582
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27735250