東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Foc...

Jung, Ji-Yung .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive./
作者:	Jung, Ji-Yung .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	368 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-06A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27543465
ISBN:	9781392579633

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive.
Jung, Ji-Yung .

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 368 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Learning a second language (L2) is essential in today's globalized world. However, learners generally have low sensitivity to grammar, as L2 acquisition proceeds largely through functions. Thus, pedagogical assistance appears to be necessary to trigger learners' attention to L2 grammar, but research shows no consensus on which type of instruction best promotes it. Moreover, few empirical studies have examined acquisition of target constructions, which entails mappings between form, meaning, and function.To address this gap, the present study investigated the effects of implicit and explicit instruction on L2 acquisition of the English passive. The passive was chosen as the target construction due to the intricate mappings between form, meaning, and function encompassed in it. The study employed an experimental design including a pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest, with five treatment sessions between the pretest and posttests. Participants were 99 Korean English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners, randomly assigned to two experimental groups that received implicit or explicit instruction, respectively, or a control group. Implicit instruction comprised typographically enhanced passive constructions to increase perceptual saliency; explicit instruction comprised a grammar activity to raise the participants' consciousness about the passive construction. Five measurement tasks were employed to examine any changes in the participants' knowledge of, and ability to use, the passive: a grammaticality judgment task (GJT), a sentence pair task, a closed discourse completion task (DCT), and spoken and written production tasks.Results from quantitative and qualitative analyses of the data yielded three main findings. First, implicit instruction had a more significant, beneficial effect than explicit instruction on the overall mappings between the form, meaning, and function of the passive. Second, the difference appeared to be more salient for meaning and function, whereas both types of instruction had almost equal benefits for form; yet, the production tasks seemed to exhibit a greater score decrease as for meaning and function over time in both treatment conditions. Finally, each type of instruction had similar effects on the performance of high- and low-level learners.Overall, these findings suggest that both types of instruction are beneficial for L2 acquisition but implicit instruction is more effective than explicit instruction.

ISBN: 9781392579633Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Acquisition (form

Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive.
LDR:03796nmm a2200409 4500 001 2279362
005 20210817110120.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392579633
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27543465
035 $a AAI27543465
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jung, Ji-Yung . $3 3557810
245 1 0 $a Effects of Implicit and Explicit Focus on Form on L2 Acquisition of the English Passive.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 368 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-06, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Han, ZhaoHong.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Teachers College, Columbia University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Learning a second language (L2) is essential in today's globalized world. However, learners generally have low sensitivity to grammar, as L2 acquisition proceeds largely through functions. Thus, pedagogical assistance appears to be necessary to trigger learners' attention to L2 grammar, but research shows no consensus on which type of instruction best promotes it. Moreover, few empirical studies have examined acquisition of target constructions, which entails mappings between form, meaning, and function.To address this gap, the present study investigated the effects of implicit and explicit instruction on L2 acquisition of the English passive. The passive was chosen as the target construction due to the intricate mappings between form, meaning, and function encompassed in it. The study employed an experimental design including a pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest, with five treatment sessions between the pretest and posttests. Participants were 99 Korean English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners, randomly assigned to two experimental groups that received implicit or explicit instruction, respectively, or a control group. Implicit instruction comprised typographically enhanced passive constructions to increase perceptual saliency; explicit instruction comprised a grammar activity to raise the participants' consciousness about the passive construction. Five measurement tasks were employed to examine any changes in the participants' knowledge of, and ability to use, the passive: a grammaticality judgment task (GJT), a sentence pair task, a closed discourse completion task (DCT), and spoken and written production tasks.Results from quantitative and qualitative analyses of the data yielded three main findings. First, implicit instruction had a more significant, beneficial effect than explicit instruction on the overall mappings between the form, meaning, and function of the passive. Second, the difference appeared to be more salient for meaning and function, whereas both types of instruction had almost equal benefits for form; yet, the production tasks seemed to exhibit a greater score decrease as for meaning and function over time in both treatment conditions. Finally, each type of instruction had similar effects on the performance of high- and low-level learners.Overall, these findings suggest that both types of instruction are beneficial for L2 acquisition but implicit instruction is more effective than explicit instruction.
590 $a School code: 0055.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Language. $3 643551
650 4 $a English as a second language--ESL. $3 3423990
653 $a Acquisition (form
653 $a meaning
653 $a function)
653 $a Complexity
653 $a Implicit/explicit focus on form
653 $a Interface
653 $a Textual enhancement and consciousness-raising
653 $a The passive construction
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
710 2 $a Teachers College, Columbia University. $b Arts and Humanities. $3 2093559
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-06A.
790 $a 0055
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27543465