東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Examining College 1 Instructors' Ped...

Alpine, Megan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making./
作者:	Alpine, Megan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	309 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-02A.
標題:	Higher education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996019
ISBN:	9798662553354

Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making.
Alpine, Megan.

Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 309 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Since the founding of UC Santa Cruz in 1965, first-year undergraduate students have enrolled in a class called Core: a seminar offered by their college that introduces students to the theme of the college and, in recent decades, college-level writing. Beginning in Fall 2018, Core was reformed into a new course called College 1. Unlike Core, College 1 focuses on academic reading rather than writing and includes a common set of learning outcomes designed around the "ACMES:" analysis, critical thinking, metacognition, engagement across difference, and self-efficacy. This dissertation examines the implementation of College 1 from the perspectives of the instructors who first taught it in Fall 2018. Drawing from interviews, classroom observations, and an original survey, I examine how instructors understood the College 1 learning outcomes and taught these in their classrooms. This study sheds light on the process of implementing curricular change in higher education and, more broadly, on how individuals' sensemaking shapes change in institutions. Three main findings emerged from this study: College 1 instructors tended to adopt explicit, implicit, or oppositional approaches to teaching the course learning outcomes; instructors' classroom practices were related to their sense of autonomy over their classes; and a central challenge articulated by instructors was the integration of Chinese international students into their untracked classes. From these findings, I offer practical recommendations for future professional development trainings for College 1 instructors.

ISBN: 9798662553354Subjects--Topical Terms:

641065
Higher education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Academic literacy

Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making.
LDR:02791nmm a2200385 4500 001 2278548
005 20210628082346.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662553354
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27996019
035 $a AAI27996019
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Alpine, Megan. $3 3556927
245 1 0 $a Examining College 1 Instructors' Pedagogical Decision-making.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 309 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: London, Rebecca.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Since the founding of UC Santa Cruz in 1965, first-year undergraduate students have enrolled in a class called Core: a seminar offered by their college that introduces students to the theme of the college and, in recent decades, college-level writing. Beginning in Fall 2018, Core was reformed into a new course called College 1. Unlike Core, College 1 focuses on academic reading rather than writing and includes a common set of learning outcomes designed around the "ACMES:" analysis, critical thinking, metacognition, engagement across difference, and self-efficacy. This dissertation examines the implementation of College 1 from the perspectives of the instructors who first taught it in Fall 2018. Drawing from interviews, classroom observations, and an original survey, I examine how instructors understood the College 1 learning outcomes and taught these in their classrooms. This study sheds light on the process of implementing curricular change in higher education and, more broadly, on how individuals' sensemaking shapes change in institutions. Three main findings emerged from this study: College 1 instructors tended to adopt explicit, implicit, or oppositional approaches to teaching the course learning outcomes; instructors' classroom practices were related to their sense of autonomy over their classes; and a central challenge articulated by instructors was the integration of Chinese international students into their untracked classes. From these findings, I offer practical recommendations for future professional development trainings for College 1 instructors.
590 $a School code: 0036.
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
653 $a Academic literacy
653 $a International students
653 $a Learning outcomes
653 $a Non-tenure track faculty
653 $a Pedagogy
653 $a Sensemaking theory
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a University of California, Santa Cruz. $b Sociology. $3 3186529
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-02A.
790 $a 0036
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996019