東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Theoretical Integration of Procedu...

Steele, Alaina Dawn.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories./
作者:	Steele, Alaina Dawn.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	225 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-04A.
標題:	Criminology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962235
ISBN:	9798678161475

A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories.
Steele, Alaina Dawn.

A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 225 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This research study used negative binomial regression to examine the individual and interactive effects of deterrence and procedural justice on frequency of offending counts among serious juvenile offenders. To test the research question, this study utilized the Pathways to Desistance study to test the efficacy of the integration of deterrence theory and procedural justice theory. Deterrence theory is grounded in the classical school of criminology and its rational choice perspective. It argues that individuals will weigh the costs and benefits associated with a criminal act and choose to act in such a manner that will maximize benefits and minimize costs (Cullen & Jonson, 2012). A growing body of research suggests that fairness (i.e., procedural justice) process within the criminal justice process can be effective in the fight against crime, disorder, and recidivism. Procedural justice, sometimes referred to as procedural fairness, refers to perceived fairness within the criminal justice process, even when outcomes are not viewed as favorable (Gold & Bradley, 2013). It accomplishes this by fostering a "buy-in" to laws and directives that enhances cooperation and consent.Because laws are only as good as our ability to enforce them, substituting procedural justice for deterrence would essentially remove the teeth from such laws. However, that does not preclude the development of a theoretical integration of the two. Specifically, such an integration might be more effective in reducing crime and disorder than each would be able to achieve on its own. To test the research question, this study integrated the theories of deterrence and procedural justice and examined whether the additive interaction of procedural justice and deterrence predicted decreased offending counts to a greater extent than what was obtained separately.Study results indicated that overall, deterrence, procedural justice, and their interaction all predicted decreases in offending. That said, overall findings suggested their interaction more consistently supported decreases in offending. That said, study findings also suggested that deterrence was driving the predictions of decreased frequency of offending counts with procedural justice playing a supportive role. Thus, the recommendation is that procedural justice should be integrated into the current deterrence framework. This can be accomplished through training criminal justice actors in the nuances of procedural justice that can be incorporated into their interactions with citizens to foster immediate acceptance and long-term compliance.

ISBN: 9798678161475Subjects--Topical Terms:

533274
Criminology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Deterrence

A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories.
LDR:03756nmm a2200361 4500 001 2278367
005 20210628075009.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798678161475
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27962235
035 $a AAI27962235
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Steele, Alaina Dawn. $3 3556745
245 1 0 $a A Theoretical Integration of Procedural Justice and Deterrence: A Tale of Two Theories.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 225 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Mullins, Christopher.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research study used negative binomial regression to examine the individual and interactive effects of deterrence and procedural justice on frequency of offending counts among serious juvenile offenders. To test the research question, this study utilized the Pathways to Desistance study to test the efficacy of the integration of deterrence theory and procedural justice theory. Deterrence theory is grounded in the classical school of criminology and its rational choice perspective. It argues that individuals will weigh the costs and benefits associated with a criminal act and choose to act in such a manner that will maximize benefits and minimize costs (Cullen & Jonson, 2012). A growing body of research suggests that fairness (i.e., procedural justice) process within the criminal justice process can be effective in the fight against crime, disorder, and recidivism. Procedural justice, sometimes referred to as procedural fairness, refers to perceived fairness within the criminal justice process, even when outcomes are not viewed as favorable (Gold & Bradley, 2013). It accomplishes this by fostering a "buy-in" to laws and directives that enhances cooperation and consent.Because laws are only as good as our ability to enforce them, substituting procedural justice for deterrence would essentially remove the teeth from such laws. However, that does not preclude the development of a theoretical integration of the two. Specifically, such an integration might be more effective in reducing crime and disorder than each would be able to achieve on its own. To test the research question, this study integrated the theories of deterrence and procedural justice and examined whether the additive interaction of procedural justice and deterrence predicted decreased offending counts to a greater extent than what was obtained separately.Study results indicated that overall, deterrence, procedural justice, and their interaction all predicted decreases in offending. That said, overall findings suggested their interaction more consistently supported decreases in offending. That said, study findings also suggested that deterrence was driving the predictions of decreased frequency of offending counts with procedural justice playing a supportive role. Thus, the recommendation is that procedural justice should be integrated into the current deterrence framework. This can be accomplished through training criminal justice actors in the nuances of procedural justice that can be incorporated into their interactions with citizens to foster immediate acceptance and long-term compliance.
590 $a School code: 0209.
650 4 $a Criminology. $3 533274
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Law enforcement. $3 607408
653 $a Deterrence
653 $a Procedural Justice
653 $a Juvenile offenders
690 $a 0627
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0206
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. $b Criminology and Criminal Justice. $3 2096553
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-04A.
790 $a 0209
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962235