東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Go Out and Play! A Defense of Patern...

Arthur, Philip.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being./
Author:	Arthur, Philip.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	74 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-03.
Subject:	Education policy. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028480
ISBN:	9798664757576

Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being.
Arthur, Philip.

Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 74 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Studies suggest that graduate students experience higher rates of anxiety and depression than their peers outside of academia. Studies also show exercise is correlated with lower levels of anxiety and depression among graduate students. However, despite this evidence, nearly half of graduate students do not exercise regularly. Accordingly, I suggest universities consider adding an exercise requirement to promote graduate student well-being. One potential objection to this recommendation is that an exercise requirement is objectionably paternalistic. I answer this objection with two possible replies. First, there are reasons why the exercise requirement might not be paternalistic, and there may be sufficient non-paternalistic reasons to justify the policy. Second, there are reasons why even if the policy is paternalistic, it is not objectionably paternalistic, and may still be justified. I will offer reasons to consider paternalism in a positive light and why the exercise requirement may be an example of a good paternalistic policy. Because the exercise requirement might be justified on paternalistic grounds, there are reasons to consider other paternalistic policies to promote graduate student well-being.

ISBN: 9798664757576Subjects--Topical Terms:

2191387
Education policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Exercise and well-being

Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being.
LDR:02389nmm a2200373 4500 001 2278085
005 20210611082018.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664757576
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28028480
035 $a AAI28028480
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Arthur, Philip. $3 3556448
245 1 0 $a Go Out and Play! A Defense of Paternalistic Policies to Promote Graduate Student Well-Being.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 74 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
500 $a Advisor: de Marneffe, Peter.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Arizona State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Studies suggest that graduate students experience higher rates of anxiety and depression than their peers outside of academia. Studies also show exercise is correlated with lower levels of anxiety and depression among graduate students. However, despite this evidence, nearly half of graduate students do not exercise regularly. Accordingly, I suggest universities consider adding an exercise requirement to promote graduate student well-being. One potential objection to this recommendation is that an exercise requirement is objectionably paternalistic. I answer this objection with two possible replies. First, there are reasons why the exercise requirement might not be paternalistic, and there may be sufficient non-paternalistic reasons to justify the policy. Second, there are reasons why even if the policy is paternalistic, it is not objectionably paternalistic, and may still be justified. I will offer reasons to consider paternalism in a positive light and why the exercise requirement may be an example of a good paternalistic policy. Because the exercise requirement might be justified on paternalistic grounds, there are reasons to consider other paternalistic policies to promote graduate student well-being.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 3173367
653 $a Exercise and well-being
653 $a Graduate student well-being
653 $a Graduate students
653 $a Paternalism
653 $a Well-being
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Philosophy. $3 3171306
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-03.
790 $a 0010
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028480