東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Live Coding the Communication Comple...

Mancini, Jordana.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool./
Author:	Mancini, Jordana.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	50 p.
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-05.
Subject:	Speech therapy. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28029855
ISBN:	9798684696565

Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool.
Mancini, Jordana.

Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 50 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In this preliminary research study, the effect of live scoring versus video scoring of theobservational rating tool, the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS), was examined throughthree participant variables and one assessment variable: communication level of the participant,age of the participant, severity of autism of the participant, and assessment task function (jointattention or behavior regulation). Participants included 42 children between three and 18 years ofage, who were referred by special educators in the suburban Kansas City, KS and Lawrence, KSschool districts. Children were administered a 30-minute, scripted play-based assessment whichused "sabotaged" games or toys to promote communication of the research subjects. The CCSwas used to score the assessment by a live coder, as well as a video coder at a delayed time.Through analysis conducted in this study, it was found that there was not a significant differencewhen applying the CCS as an observational tool regardless of the participants communicationlevel, age, severity of autism, nor the function of the task assessed by the scripted play-assessment.In clinical application, it was found that live and video scoring are bothmethodologically sound mediums to apply the CCS, which can be used based on clinician orclient preferences or needs.

ISBN: 9798684696565Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessment

Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool.
LDR:02465nmm a2200361 4500 001 2276567
005 20210510090201.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798684696565
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28029855
035 $a AAI28029855
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mancini, Jordana. $3 3554855
245 1 0 $a Live Coding the Communication Complexity Scale: Validation of a Clinically Relevant Observation Tool.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 50 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.
500 $a Advisor: Brady, Nancy C.;Pedersen, Kris.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In this preliminary research study, the effect of live scoring versus video scoring of theobservational rating tool, the Communication Complexity Scale (CCS), was examined throughthree participant variables and one assessment variable: communication level of the participant,age of the participant, severity of autism of the participant, and assessment task function (jointattention or behavior regulation). Participants included 42 children between three and 18 years ofage, who were referred by special educators in the suburban Kansas City, KS and Lawrence, KSschool districts. Children were administered a 30-minute, scripted play-based assessment whichused "sabotaged" games or toys to promote communication of the research subjects. The CCSwas used to score the assessment by a live coder, as well as a video coder at a delayed time.Through analysis conducted in this study, it was found that there was not a significant differencewhen applying the CCS as an observational tool regardless of the participants communicationlevel, age, severity of autism, nor the function of the task assessed by the scripted play-assessment.In clinical application, it was found that live and video scoring are bothmethodologically sound mediums to apply the CCS, which can be used based on clinician orclient preferences or needs.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
653 $a Assessment
653 $a Autism
653 $a Communication Complexity Scale
653 $a Minimally verbal
653 $a School-age
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0524
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Hearing and Speech. $3 2098877
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-05.
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28029855