東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effects of Noncontingent Reinforceme...

Kanaman, Nicole A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement./
作者:	Kanaman, Nicole A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	58 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-06.
標題:	Experimental psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28029445
ISBN:	9798684689376

Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement.
Kanaman, Nicole A.

Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 58 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is an evidenced-based procedure that has been shown to be effective for reducing problem behavior maintained by social positive reinforcement (Carr et al., 2009). NCR typically involves the delivery of the functional reinforcer on a dense (often continuous) schedule (Carr et al., 2000) that is not feasible in all environments; thus, researchers have evaluated NCR with alternative stimuli (i.e., stimuli not responsible for maintaining the behavior) to implement during times in which the functional reinforcer is unavailable (e.g., Hanley et al., 1997). The purpose of the current evaluation is to replicate and extend this literature by (a) evaluating the use of NCR with alternative reinforcers (identified via a competing-stimulus assessment; Fisher et al., 2000) for decreasing the socially-maintained problem behavior of four adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and (b) determine the generality of these interventions under longer session duration and with various therapists in various settings. Preliminary data suggest the efficacy and generality of providing access to noncontingent attention when the functional reinforcer is unavailable for one participant who engaged in problem behavior maintained by tangibles.

ISBN: 9798684689376Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144733
Experimental psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Competing-stimulus assessment

Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement.
LDR:02462nmm a2200349 4500 001 2276566
005 20210510090200.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798684689376
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28029445
035 $a AAI28029445
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kanaman, Nicole A. $3 3554854
245 1 0 $a Effects of Noncontingent Reinforcement with Competing Stimuli for Decreasing Problem Behavior Maintained by Social Positive Reinforcement.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 58 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
500 $a Advisor: Dozier, Claudia L.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) is an evidenced-based procedure that has been shown to be effective for reducing problem behavior maintained by social positive reinforcement (Carr et al., 2009). NCR typically involves the delivery of the functional reinforcer on a dense (often continuous) schedule (Carr et al., 2000) that is not feasible in all environments; thus, researchers have evaluated NCR with alternative stimuli (i.e., stimuli not responsible for maintaining the behavior) to implement during times in which the functional reinforcer is unavailable (e.g., Hanley et al., 1997). The purpose of the current evaluation is to replicate and extend this literature by (a) evaluating the use of NCR with alternative reinforcers (identified via a competing-stimulus assessment; Fisher et al., 2000) for decreasing the socially-maintained problem behavior of four adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and (b) determine the generality of these interventions under longer session duration and with various therapists in various settings. Preliminary data suggest the efficacy and generality of providing access to noncontingent attention when the functional reinforcer is unavailable for one participant who engaged in problem behavior maintained by tangibles.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Competing-stimulus assessment
653 $a Noncontingent reinforcement
653 $a Problem behavior
653 $a Social positive reinforcement
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Applied Behavioral Science. $3 1019323
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-06.
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28029445