東華大學圖書館 |

Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis./
Author:	Nizkorodov, Evgenia.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	332 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-06B.
Subject:	Water resources management. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28094164
ISBN:	9798557021630

Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis.
Nizkorodov, Evgenia.

Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 332 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

California faces a number of pressing threats to water supply and quality, including ageing infrastructure, climate volatility, and demographic pressure. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) may be uniquely positioned to address these challenges through the private partner's ability to mobilize resources, provide technical expertise, and share project risks. However, the best practices and impacts of PPPs are not well understood. This research clarifies the role of the private sector in bolstering sustainability and social-ecological resilience in California's water sector through a qualitative comparative case analysis of seven infrastructure and three data-oriented water PPPs. Semi-structured interviews, observations, shadowing, and document analysis are utilized to examine (1) the endogenous and exogenous drivers of PPPs, (2) socio-economic, environmental, and political impacts of projects, (3) challenges faced throughout the project lifetime, and (4) lessons learned. Three theoretical frameworks (social-ecological resilience, holistic sustainability, and new institutionalism) guide the analysis of impacts and illuminate the opportunities and constraints facing PPP project participants.The cases suggest that when carefully managed, PPPs can result in environmentally beneficial projects that diversify local water resources and improve efficiency of water utility operations. Moreover, through risk sharing and pooling of resources, PPPs provide a "unique opportunity" for the traditionally risk-averse water sector to pursue innovative technologies that minimize risks to ratepayers in the early stages of a project. However, PPPs face a tension between economic efficiency and equity. Public sector respondents stressed the challenge of "getting the best deal" for the public in the face of diverging priorities between public and private actors, information asymmetries, and limited experience in negotiating PPP contracts. A complex permitting process and evolving environmental regulations exacerbate this tradeoff through cost overruns and project delays. Distributional impacts to ratepayers can be reduced through mutual agreement of project goals and benefits, a robust contract structure that quantifies performance standards and provides opportunities for adaptive learning, and the inclusion of end-users and affected stakeholders early on in the project life-cycle. Evaluation of PPP impacts also suggests that gains in short-term resilience can occur at the expense of distributional impacts to low-income water users or to ecosystems. The cases reveal that considerations of ecological well-being requires significant intervention on behalf of regulatory agencies. NGOs may play a critical role in future PPPs by increasing environmental sensitivity of projects, monitoring adverse environmental impacts, and serving as "bridges" between regulatory agencies and water utilities. This dissertation fills a critical policy and research gap. The research examines the first water PPP projects in California. This study, thus, is a unique opportunity to examine institutional innovation in an organizational domain that has high socio-technical and regulatory constraints. This study also introduces a new role for PPPs in the water sector: data collaboratives can aid water districts in effective and science-based decision-making and provide alternatives to a "hard infrastructure" approach to water management. Finally, this is one of the first studies to evaluate PPP projects across all three dimensions of sustainability, paying careful attention to the distributional impacts of these partnerships. Ultimately, the research assists water districts in providing much-needed water system upgrades in a way that ensures that projects are economically efficient, environmentally sound, and do not disproportionately impact low-income populations.

ISBN: 9798557021630Subjects--Topical Terms:

794747
Water resources management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Public-private partnerships (PPPs)

Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis.
LDR:05344nmm a2200445 4500 001 2276367
005 20210503061418.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798557021630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28094164
035 $a AAI28094164
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Nizkorodov, Evgenia. $3 3353742
245 1 0 $a Evaluating the Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Bolstering Sustainability and Resilience in California's Water Sector: A Comparative Case Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 332 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Matthew, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Irvine, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a California faces a number of pressing threats to water supply and quality, including ageing infrastructure, climate volatility, and demographic pressure. Public-private partnerships (PPPs) may be uniquely positioned to address these challenges through the private partner's ability to mobilize resources, provide technical expertise, and share project risks. However, the best practices and impacts of PPPs are not well understood. This research clarifies the role of the private sector in bolstering sustainability and social-ecological resilience in California's water sector through a qualitative comparative case analysis of seven infrastructure and three data-oriented water PPPs. Semi-structured interviews, observations, shadowing, and document analysis are utilized to examine (1) the endogenous and exogenous drivers of PPPs, (2) socio-economic, environmental, and political impacts of projects, (3) challenges faced throughout the project lifetime, and (4) lessons learned. Three theoretical frameworks (social-ecological resilience, holistic sustainability, and new institutionalism) guide the analysis of impacts and illuminate the opportunities and constraints facing PPP project participants.The cases suggest that when carefully managed, PPPs can result in environmentally beneficial projects that diversify local water resources and improve efficiency of water utility operations. Moreover, through risk sharing and pooling of resources, PPPs provide a "unique opportunity" for the traditionally risk-averse water sector to pursue innovative technologies that minimize risks to ratepayers in the early stages of a project. However, PPPs face a tension between economic efficiency and equity. Public sector respondents stressed the challenge of "getting the best deal" for the public in the face of diverging priorities between public and private actors, information asymmetries, and limited experience in negotiating PPP contracts. A complex permitting process and evolving environmental regulations exacerbate this tradeoff through cost overruns and project delays. Distributional impacts to ratepayers can be reduced through mutual agreement of project goals and benefits, a robust contract structure that quantifies performance standards and provides opportunities for adaptive learning, and the inclusion of end-users and affected stakeholders early on in the project life-cycle. Evaluation of PPP impacts also suggests that gains in short-term resilience can occur at the expense of distributional impacts to low-income water users or to ecosystems. The cases reveal that considerations of ecological well-being requires significant intervention on behalf of regulatory agencies. NGOs may play a critical role in future PPPs by increasing environmental sensitivity of projects, monitoring adverse environmental impacts, and serving as "bridges" between regulatory agencies and water utilities. This dissertation fills a critical policy and research gap. The research examines the first water PPP projects in California. This study, thus, is a unique opportunity to examine institutional innovation in an organizational domain that has high socio-technical and regulatory constraints. This study also introduces a new role for PPPs in the water sector: data collaboratives can aid water districts in effective and science-based decision-making and provide alternatives to a "hard infrastructure" approach to water management. Finally, this is one of the first studies to evaluate PPP projects across all three dimensions of sustainability, paying careful attention to the distributional impacts of these partnerships. Ultimately, the research assists water districts in providing much-needed water system upgrades in a way that ensures that projects are economically efficient, environmentally sound, and do not disproportionately impact low-income populations.
590 $a School code: 0030.
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 794747
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Area planning & development. $3 3172430
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
653 $a Public-private partnerships (PPPs)
653 $a California
653 $a Water sector
653 $a Ageing infrastructure
653 $a Social-ecological resilience
653 $a Water utility operations
653 $a Environmental regulations
653 $a Low-income populations
690 $a 0595
690 $a 0640
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0341
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a University of California, Irvine. $b Social Ecology - Ph.D.. $3 2096473
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-06B.
790 $a 0030
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28094164