東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fl...

Johnson, Sean Isamu.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability./
作者:	Johnson, Sean Isamu.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	79 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-12.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996234
ISBN:	9798641523941

Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability.
Johnson, Sean Isamu.

Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 79 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.

Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Cognitive scientists have demonstrated that it is possible to manipulate the cognitive fluency of a language processing task-or its difficulty or ease-to affect the believability of statements made in the task (e.g., Reber and Schwarz, 1999). In a separate line of interdisciplinary research on plain language-a movement that emphasizes audience comprehension-researchers have shown that certain linguistic constructions are easier for people to understand than others (e.g., Olson & Filby, 1972). The purpose of this study is to combine the insights from these two fields in order to address the question of whether using more cognitively fluent language, i.e., plain language, contributes to inflated judgments of believability. In an experiment, 98 participants were randomly assigned to one of two surveys in which they were asked to read statements and rate their believability on a scale of 0 to 100. Although there was an overall trend that indicated that plain language was more believable than non-plain language and three independent sample t-tests showed that there were significant effects within three of the plain language/non-plain language statement pairs, a 2x2 mixed ANOVA revealed that there was no significant main effect for plain language vs. non-plain language overall. If the trends observed in this study reflect a real effect, then they would support the theory that any factor that decreases the cognitive fluency of language negatively affects the believability of propositions made in the language.

ISBN: 9798641523941Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Believability

Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability.
LDR:02673nmm a2200397 4500 001 2275897
005 20210416102207.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641523941
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27996234
035 $a AAI27996234
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnson, Sean Isamu. $3 3554145
245 1 0 $a Uniting Plain Language, Cognitive Fluency, and Believability.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 79 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
500 $a Advisor: Gales, Tammy.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Hofstra University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Cognitive scientists have demonstrated that it is possible to manipulate the cognitive fluency of a language processing task-or its difficulty or ease-to affect the believability of statements made in the task (e.g., Reber and Schwarz, 1999). In a separate line of interdisciplinary research on plain language-a movement that emphasizes audience comprehension-researchers have shown that certain linguistic constructions are easier for people to understand than others (e.g., Olson & Filby, 1972). The purpose of this study is to combine the insights from these two fields in order to address the question of whether using more cognitively fluent language, i.e., plain language, contributes to inflated judgments of believability. In an experiment, 98 participants were randomly assigned to one of two surveys in which they were asked to read statements and rate their believability on a scale of 0 to 100. Although there was an overall trend that indicated that plain language was more believable than non-plain language and three independent sample t-tests showed that there were significant effects within three of the plain language/non-plain language statement pairs, a 2x2 mixed ANOVA revealed that there was no significant main effect for plain language vs. non-plain language overall. If the trends observed in this study reflect a real effect, then they would support the theory that any factor that decreases the cognitive fluency of language negatively affects the believability of propositions made in the language.
590 $a School code: 0086.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Behavioral sciences. $3 529833
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
653 $a Believability
653 $a Cognitive Fluency
653 $a Crowdsourcing
653 $a MTurk
653 $a Plain Language
653 $a Truth Effect
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0602
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Hofstra University. $b Forensic Linguistics. $3 3289212
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-12.
790 $a 0086
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27996234