東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps an...

Minde, Julie.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution./
Author:	Minde, Julie.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:	189 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12B.
Subject:	Geography. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27837374
ISBN:	9798645480844

Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution.
Minde, Julie.

Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 189 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This research examined the relationship between stakeholder perception of legitimacy of maps/mapping and conflict resolution. Evaluation of perceptions of legitimacy in maps/mapping as part of conflict resolution can manifest as questions or judgments about who has the authority or right to map, what information sources and ways of knowing are legitimate, and what map products and methods are legitimate. A theoretical framework was developed that focused on three areas of legitimacy determined to be fundamental: legitimacy of stakeholder, legitimacy of information, and legitimacy of representation. Two water-related environmental resource case studies, each involving multiple types of stakeholders (e.g., citizen, government, agriculture, environment) involved in conflict resolution working groups, were investigated and comparatively analyzed. The Delmarva case focused on a chicken litter management conflict. The Lynnhaven case dealt with a conflict concerning oyster cultivation. Research results include findings about the importance of social considerations, framing, and abundant participant input concerning their opinions, experiences, and recommendations concerning maps/mapping in conflict resolution. A particularly significant discovery was the central and defining role legitimacy of stakeholder played in both case studies. Lastly, it is hoped that this research might be useful to conflict resolution practitioners in their attempts to "level the playing field" for stakeholders in conflict resolution activities. Therefore, potential implications and recommendations are provided that might be used to guide efforts to ensure appropriate, positive perception of legitimacy of maps/mapping among stakeholders, thereby encouraging constructive engagement, key to conflict resolution success.

ISBN: 9798645480844Subjects--Topical Terms:

524010
Geography.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Conflict

Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution.
LDR:02904nmm a2200361 4500 001 2274465
005 20201202125031.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798645480844
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27837374
035 $a AAI27837374
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Minde, Julie. $3 3551956
245 1 0 $a Perceptions of Legitimacy of Maps and Mapping in Conflict Resolution.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 189 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Allen, Susan.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This research examined the relationship between stakeholder perception of legitimacy of maps/mapping and conflict resolution. Evaluation of perceptions of legitimacy in maps/mapping as part of conflict resolution can manifest as questions or judgments about who has the authority or right to map, what information sources and ways of knowing are legitimate, and what map products and methods are legitimate. A theoretical framework was developed that focused on three areas of legitimacy determined to be fundamental: legitimacy of stakeholder, legitimacy of information, and legitimacy of representation. Two water-related environmental resource case studies, each involving multiple types of stakeholders (e.g., citizen, government, agriculture, environment) involved in conflict resolution working groups, were investigated and comparatively analyzed. The Delmarva case focused on a chicken litter management conflict. The Lynnhaven case dealt with a conflict concerning oyster cultivation. Research results include findings about the importance of social considerations, framing, and abundant participant input concerning their opinions, experiences, and recommendations concerning maps/mapping in conflict resolution. A particularly significant discovery was the central and defining role legitimacy of stakeholder played in both case studies. Lastly, it is hoped that this research might be useful to conflict resolution practitioners in their attempts to "level the playing field" for stakeholders in conflict resolution activities. Therefore, potential implications and recommendations are provided that might be used to guide efforts to ensure appropriate, positive perception of legitimacy of maps/mapping among stakeholders, thereby encouraging constructive engagement, key to conflict resolution success.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
650 4 $a Peace studies. $3 3172392
650 4 $a Water resources management. $3 794747
653 $a Conflict
653 $a Legitimacy
653 $a Map
653 $a Perception
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0563
690 $a 0595
710 2 $a George Mason University. $b Conflict Analysis and Resolution. $3 3177383
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12B.
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27837374