東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The validity of cognitive constructs...

Paivandy, Sheba L.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories./
Author:	Paivandy, Sheba L.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2008,
Description:	125 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International70-08B.
Subject:	School counseling. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3340749
ISBN:	9780549957461

The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories.
Paivandy, Sheba L.

The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2008 - 125 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2008.

The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of combining cognitive constructs presented in two principal cognitive approaches to career theory: cognitive information processing theory (CIP) and social cognitive career theory (SCCT). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the items from four cognitive measures used to measure the constructs of these theories. This analysis yielded a four factor model suggesting a different factor structure from what is currently being utilized for these measures. These four factors were identified as Factor 1: negative career thoughts, Factor 2: career decision-making self-efficacy, Factor 3: self-motivation and commitment to career decision making, and Factor 4: discouragement in career indecision. The overall contribution of CIP, SCCT, and the combined model to the prediction of self-exploration, environmental exploration, and level of career decidedness were compared using a series of regression analyses. The combined model did not consistently predict for the outcome variables over and above CIP and SCCT as hypothesized. However, the comparison of beta weights for factors from each model suggested that the combined model's factors have stronger, more unique predictive power than CIP and SCCT. Implications for future research and career counseling are discussed.

ISBN: 9780549957461Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144793
School counseling.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Career counseling

The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories.
LDR:02598nmm a2200385 4500 001 2270894
005 20201007134034.5
008 220629s2008 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780549957461
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3340749
035 $a AAI3340749
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Paivandy, Sheba L. $3 3548270
245 1 4 $a The validity of cognitive constructs in cognitive information processing and social cognitive career theories.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2008
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 70-08, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2008.
520 $a The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity of combining cognitive constructs presented in two principal cognitive approaches to career theory: cognitive information processing theory (CIP) and social cognitive career theory (SCCT). An exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the items from four cognitive measures used to measure the constructs of these theories. This analysis yielded a four factor model suggesting a different factor structure from what is currently being utilized for these measures. These four factors were identified as Factor 1: negative career thoughts, Factor 2: career decision-making self-efficacy, Factor 3: self-motivation and commitment to career decision making, and Factor 4: discouragement in career indecision. The overall contribution of CIP, SCCT, and the combined model to the prediction of self-exploration, environmental exploration, and level of career decidedness were compared using a series of regression analyses. The combined model did not consistently predict for the outcome variables over and above CIP and SCCT as hypothesized. However, the comparison of beta weights for factors from each model suggested that the combined model's factors have stronger, more unique predictive power than CIP and SCCT. Implications for future research and career counseling are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0071.
650 4 $a School counseling. $3 2144793
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Vocational education. $3 539232
650 4 $a Validity. $3 3548271
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 520219
650 4 $a Careers. $3 940888
653 $a Career counseling
653 $a Career theory
653 $a Cognitive constructs
653 $a Cognitive information processing theory
653 $a Information processing
653 $a Social cognitive
653 $a Social cognitive career theory
690 $a 0519
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0747
710 2 $a The Florida State University. $3 1017727
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 70-08B.
790 $a 0071
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2008
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3340749