Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of...
~
McIntire, Cindy .
Linked to FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping.
Record Type:
Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping./
Author:
McIntire, Cindy .
Published:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
Description:
182 p.
Notes:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International81-09B.
Subject:
Counseling psychology. -
Online resource:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27738174
ISBN:
9781392539798
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping.
McIntire, Cindy .
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 182 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2020.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Gatekeeping has been studied from the counselor educator's perspective; however, few studies assess gatekeeping from the perspective of clinical counseling supervisors. Clinical counseling supervisors are charged with the professional obligation to protect the field; yet, there are no set standards of how to ethically and legally perform gatekeeping functions. The purpose of this generic qualitative inquiry is to investigate how clinical counseling supervisors engage in gatekeeping functions; specifically focusing on what processes are being performed, what processes are successfully working, and what are barriers or challenges to engaging in gatekeeping. This generic qualitative study explores the experiences of ten adult clinical counseling supervisors as they engaged in gatekeeping functions. In semi structured, one-on-one guided interviews, the participants provided their experiences of gatekeeping. The data was evaluated by thematic analysis. Data analysis by hand-coding yielded the following themes: modus operandi (MO), complexity (C), and weighted responsibility (WR). While the lack of professional standards, insufficient training, lack of support from the profession, and internal conflicts were described as barriers to performing gatekeeping functions, the findings identified training, collaboration, and experience, as professional strengths to engaging in gatekeeping. The clinical counseling supervisors shared similar experiences when engaging in gatekeeping; however, they offered differing levels of self-assurance based upon development and experience. Limitations to this study included a small sample, the researcher's lack of experience, and the lack of expansive developmental steps in the research theory. Furthermore, interviewing diverse licensures is not specialization specific and may lack relevance to specific licensing fields. Recommendations for future research include gathering a larger and more diverse sample, using a different methodology, and potentially using a different developmental theory.
ISBN: 9781392539798Subjects--Topical Terms:
924824
Counseling psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Counseling
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping.
LDR
:03152nmm a2200337 4500
001
2270615
005
20200930060349.5
008
220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781392539798
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI27738174
035
$a
AAI27738174
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
McIntire, Cindy .
$3
3547992
245
1 0
$a
A Generic Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Counseling Supervisors' Experiences of Gatekeeping.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2020
300
$a
182 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Brooke-Werley, Stephanie.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2020.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Gatekeeping has been studied from the counselor educator's perspective; however, few studies assess gatekeeping from the perspective of clinical counseling supervisors. Clinical counseling supervisors are charged with the professional obligation to protect the field; yet, there are no set standards of how to ethically and legally perform gatekeeping functions. The purpose of this generic qualitative inquiry is to investigate how clinical counseling supervisors engage in gatekeeping functions; specifically focusing on what processes are being performed, what processes are successfully working, and what are barriers or challenges to engaging in gatekeeping. This generic qualitative study explores the experiences of ten adult clinical counseling supervisors as they engaged in gatekeeping functions. In semi structured, one-on-one guided interviews, the participants provided their experiences of gatekeeping. The data was evaluated by thematic analysis. Data analysis by hand-coding yielded the following themes: modus operandi (MO), complexity (C), and weighted responsibility (WR). While the lack of professional standards, insufficient training, lack of support from the profession, and internal conflicts were described as barriers to performing gatekeeping functions, the findings identified training, collaboration, and experience, as professional strengths to engaging in gatekeeping. The clinical counseling supervisors shared similar experiences when engaging in gatekeeping; however, they offered differing levels of self-assurance based upon development and experience. Limitations to this study included a small sample, the researcher's lack of experience, and the lack of expansive developmental steps in the research theory. Furthermore, interviewing diverse licensures is not specialization specific and may lack relevance to specific licensing fields. Recommendations for future research include gathering a larger and more diverse sample, using a different methodology, and potentially using a different developmental theory.
590
$a
School code: 1351.
650
4
$a
Counseling psychology.
$3
924824
653
$a
Counseling
653
$a
Education
653
$a
Gatekeeping
653
$a
Supervision
690
$a
0603
710
2
$a
Capella University.
$b
School of Counseling and Human Services.
$3
3436454
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
81-09B.
790
$a
1351
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2020
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27738174
based on 0 review(s)
Location:
ALL
電子資源
Year:
Volume Number:
Items
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Inventory Number
Location Name
Item Class
Material type
Call number
Usage Class
Loan Status
No. of reservations
Opac note
Attachments
W9422849
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
On shelf
0
1 records • Pages 1 •
1
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login