東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Comparative Study of Mainland Chin...

Wang, Yiping.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy./
作者:	Wang, Yiping.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-03.
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22584339
ISBN:	9781088344149

A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy.
Wang, Yiping.

A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 173 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.

Thesis (M.Phil.)--The Education University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study aims to investigate civic participation, political trust and political efficacy between Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong secondary students with a quantitative and comparative methodology. Research questions are (1) what are Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' intentions for future civic participation regarding illegal protest, legal protest, electoral participation, and informal political participation and what differences, if any, are there between the two groups of students? (2) how strong are Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' levels of political trust and political efficacy and what, if any, are the differences between the two groups of students? (3) how do political trust and political efficacy influence Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' intentions for future civic participation?Studies on political attitudes and civic participation are mainly based in democratic regimes and seldom are conducted in the authoritarian regime such as Mainland China or the hybrid regime such as Hong Kong. The current study has the potential to test the application of Western attitude-behavior framework in the Chinese contexts. A healthy democratic society requires citizens actively and responsively participate in politics. Political trust and political efficacy as political attitudes are important components in influencing citizens' political engagement. There are four types of civic participation are to be examined including unconventional participation such as illegal protest and conventional participation such as legal protest, electoral participation and informal political participation. This study utilized secondary data analysis with large samples. Hong Kong dataset came from ICCS 2009 with a sample size 2528 and Mainland China dataset were from CCCS 2012 with a sample size 1475. Results suggested that illegal protest was the form of future civic participation that both groups were not likely to take part in. In contrast, both groups endorsed conventional forms of future civic participation positively. Mainland Chinese students showed stronger intentions for conventional forms of future civic participation than their Hong Kong counterparts. Students from both groups endorsed political trust and political efficacy positively; again Mainland Chinese students endorsed these two scales stronger than their Hong Kong counterparts. Political trust was negatively associated with illegal protest but positively associated with legal protest, electoral participation and informal political participation. Political efficacy had a positive influence on all four modes of civic participation. Cluster analysis created profiles based on both students' political attitudes and the preference of civic participation, which illustrated the heterogeneity of the population. Four clusters emerged among Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students and were labeled Alienated-Radical Participators, Supportive-Active Participators, Loyal-Minimal Participators and Critical-Active Participators. There were more Alienated-Radical Participators among Hong Kong students and there were more Supportive-Active Participators among Mainland Chinese students. In conclusion, Mainland Chinese students demonstrated a more active citizenship than their Hong Kong counterparts. Explanations has been made from both regime type and civic education policy. Mainland China as an authoritarian regime has a stronger capacity in cultivating regime-supporting citizens than Hong Kong as a hybrid regime.

ISBN: 9781088344149Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Citizenship education

A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy.
LDR:04824nmm a2200373 4500 001 2268160
005 20200810100555.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088344149
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22584339
035 $a AAI22584339
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wang, Yiping. $3 3545420
245 1 0 $a A Comparative Study of Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong Students' Civic Participation, Political Trust and Political Efficacy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
500 $a Advisor: Coniam, David;Kennedy, Kerry J.
502 $a Thesis (M.Phil.)--The Education University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong), 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This study aims to investigate civic participation, political trust and political efficacy between Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong secondary students with a quantitative and comparative methodology. Research questions are (1) what are Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' intentions for future civic participation regarding illegal protest, legal protest, electoral participation, and informal political participation and what differences, if any, are there between the two groups of students? (2) how strong are Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' levels of political trust and political efficacy and what, if any, are the differences between the two groups of students? (3) how do political trust and political efficacy influence Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students' intentions for future civic participation?Studies on political attitudes and civic participation are mainly based in democratic regimes and seldom are conducted in the authoritarian regime such as Mainland China or the hybrid regime such as Hong Kong. The current study has the potential to test the application of Western attitude-behavior framework in the Chinese contexts. A healthy democratic society requires citizens actively and responsively participate in politics. Political trust and political efficacy as political attitudes are important components in influencing citizens' political engagement. There are four types of civic participation are to be examined including unconventional participation such as illegal protest and conventional participation such as legal protest, electoral participation and informal political participation. This study utilized secondary data analysis with large samples. Hong Kong dataset came from ICCS 2009 with a sample size 2528 and Mainland China dataset were from CCCS 2012 with a sample size 1475. Results suggested that illegal protest was the form of future civic participation that both groups were not likely to take part in. In contrast, both groups endorsed conventional forms of future civic participation positively. Mainland Chinese students showed stronger intentions for conventional forms of future civic participation than their Hong Kong counterparts. Students from both groups endorsed political trust and political efficacy positively; again Mainland Chinese students endorsed these two scales stronger than their Hong Kong counterparts. Political trust was negatively associated with illegal protest but positively associated with legal protest, electoral participation and informal political participation. Political efficacy had a positive influence on all four modes of civic participation. Cluster analysis created profiles based on both students' political attitudes and the preference of civic participation, which illustrated the heterogeneity of the population. Four clusters emerged among Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students and were labeled Alienated-Radical Participators, Supportive-Active Participators, Loyal-Minimal Participators and Critical-Active Participators. There were more Alienated-Radical Participators among Hong Kong students and there were more Supportive-Active Participators among Mainland Chinese students. In conclusion, Mainland Chinese students demonstrated a more active citizenship than their Hong Kong counterparts. Explanations has been made from both regime type and civic education policy. Mainland China as an authoritarian regime has a stronger capacity in cultivating regime-supporting citizens than Hong Kong as a hybrid regime.
590 $a School code: 1949.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Citizenship education
653 $a Civic participation
653 $a Political culture
653 $a Political efficacy
653 $a Political trust
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a The Education University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong). $b Graduate School. $3 3351801
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-03.
790 $a 1949
791 $a M.Phil.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22584339