東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Social Movements and Mass Partisansh...

Bugden, Dylan Edward.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism./
Author:	Bugden, Dylan Edward.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	141 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12B.
Subject:	Environmental Studies. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13877781
ISBN:	9781392248539

Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism.
Bugden, Dylan Edward.

Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 141 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2019.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

The studies compiled in this dissertation examine the intersection of mass partisanship and social movements. I hypothesize that certain types of movement actions (i.e."disruptive", violent, and cooperative protest) generate greater partisan polarization. I further hypothesize that more disruptive protests decrease tolerance for authoritarianism amongst partisans. Finally, I compare the effects of different types of protest on movement support across partisan groups. That is, I consider the tradeoffs that protest organizers face between generating support and generating partisan-based hostility. I base this study on an emerging social identity approach to mass partisanship, which clearly predicts that extreme protests increase outgroup threat, thus leading to more negative attitudes toward the outgroup. Likewise, the social identity approach to mass partisanship suggests that protest effectiveness should be moderated by the extremity of protest tactics. I situate this study within the social conflict-and associated protests-around global climate change. Using a large, online survey experiment (N = 2764), I expose participants to media coverage of three types of protest events: disruptive and violent, disruptive and non-violent, and non-disruptive non-violent. There is also a fourth control condition. Using a series of regression models, I demonstrate what effects these treatments have on (1) partisan polarization, (2) social dominance orientation, and (3) movement support/opposition.

ISBN: 9781392248539Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669635
Environmental Studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Centrifugal forces

Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism.
LDR:02870nmm a2200397 4500 001 2267948
005 20200810100204.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392248539
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13877781
035 $a (MiAaPQ)cornellgrad:11371
035 $a AAI13877781
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bugden, Dylan Edward. $3 3545204
245 1 0 $a Social Movements and Mass Partisanship: Convergent Identities, Centrifugal Forces, and the Case of Climate Activism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 141 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Stedman, Richard.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The studies compiled in this dissertation examine the intersection of mass partisanship and social movements. I hypothesize that certain types of movement actions (i.e."disruptive", violent, and cooperative protest) generate greater partisan polarization. I further hypothesize that more disruptive protests decrease tolerance for authoritarianism amongst partisans. Finally, I compare the effects of different types of protest on movement support across partisan groups. That is, I consider the tradeoffs that protest organizers face between generating support and generating partisan-based hostility. I base this study on an emerging social identity approach to mass partisanship, which clearly predicts that extreme protests increase outgroup threat, thus leading to more negative attitudes toward the outgroup. Likewise, the social identity approach to mass partisanship suggests that protest effectiveness should be moderated by the extremity of protest tactics. I situate this study within the social conflict-and associated protests-around global climate change. Using a large, online survey experiment (N = 2764), I expose participants to media coverage of three types of protest events: disruptive and violent, disruptive and non-violent, and non-disruptive non-violent. There is also a fourth control condition. Using a series of regression models, I demonstrate what effects these treatments have on (1) partisan polarization, (2) social dominance orientation, and (3) movement support/opposition.
590 $a School code: 0058.
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 1669635
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
653 $a Centrifugal forces
653 $a Climate activism
653 $a Convergent identities
653 $a Mass partisanship
653 $a Social movements
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a Cornell University. $b Natural Resources. $3 3277005
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12B.
790 $a 0058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13877781