東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patie...

Yabe, Manako.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study./
Author:	Yabe, Manako.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03A.
Subject:	Technology education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27603242
ISBN:	9781088337493

Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study.
Yabe, Manako.

Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Chicago, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Many hospitals have popularized the use of Video Remote Interpreting (VRI), a technology that facilitates communication between healthcare providers and deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) patients in medical settings. The technology utilizes American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters by way of a computer or tablet with a webcam and Internet connection. While VRI provides prompt services for emergency care and is cheaper than in-person interpreting services, there have been several challenges with its use, such as poor connection, limited flexibility to maneuver, or small screen size, which makes it difficult to see ASL interpreters or DHH patients on the screen. To improve VRI services, this study investigated the preferences and priorities of healthcare providers and DHH patients related to VRI and in-person interpreting. The study utilized a mixed methods approach. Data collection included a quantitative online survey for healthcare providers and DHH patients to learn about their preferences regarding VRI versus in-person interpreting, as well as qualitative in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and DHH patients. Findings indicated that both healthcare providers and DHH patients prefer in-person interpreting for critical care to obtain effective communication, translation accuracy, trust-building, and better treatments. Despite their preferences, both groups often end up using VRI due to time demands, budget concerns, limited in-person interpreter availability, and constraints imposed by hospital administration systems.Based on study findings, recommendations for not only improving VRI equipment, and improving healthcare communication with deaf patients include: training healthcare providers for cultural interaction; training hospital administrators and VRI companies to meet legal obligations; medical training for VRI interpreters; and training DHH patients and their families for understanding their rights.

ISBN: 9781088337493Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423978
Technology education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Video Remote Interpreting

Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study.
LDR:03203nmm a2200373 4500 001 2267461
005 20200707094524.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088337493
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27603242
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0799vireo1501Yabe
035 $a AAI27603242
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Yabe, Manako. $3 3544712
245 1 0 $a Healthcare Providers' and Deaf Patients' Perspectives on Video Remote Interpreting: A Mixed Methods Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Mirza, Mansha.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Chicago, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Many hospitals have popularized the use of Video Remote Interpreting (VRI), a technology that facilitates communication between healthcare providers and deaf/hard of hearing (DHH) patients in medical settings. The technology utilizes American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters by way of a computer or tablet with a webcam and Internet connection. While VRI provides prompt services for emergency care and is cheaper than in-person interpreting services, there have been several challenges with its use, such as poor connection, limited flexibility to maneuver, or small screen size, which makes it difficult to see ASL interpreters or DHH patients on the screen. To improve VRI services, this study investigated the preferences and priorities of healthcare providers and DHH patients related to VRI and in-person interpreting. The study utilized a mixed methods approach. Data collection included a quantitative online survey for healthcare providers and DHH patients to learn about their preferences regarding VRI versus in-person interpreting, as well as qualitative in-depth interviews with healthcare providers and DHH patients. Findings indicated that both healthcare providers and DHH patients prefer in-person interpreting for critical care to obtain effective communication, translation accuracy, trust-building, and better treatments. Despite their preferences, both groups often end up using VRI due to time demands, budget concerns, limited in-person interpreter availability, and constraints imposed by hospital administration systems.Based on study findings, recommendations for not only improving VRI equipment, and improving healthcare communication with deaf patients include: training healthcare providers for cultural interaction; training hospital administrators and VRI companies to meet legal obligations; medical training for VRI interpreters; and training DHH patients and their families for understanding their rights.
590 $a School code: 0799.
650 4 $a Technology education. $3 3423978
650 4 $a Speech. $3 530580
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
653 $a Video Remote Interpreting
653 $a In-Person Interpreting
653 $a Deaf/Hard of Hearing Patients
653 $a Healthcare Providers
653 $a Healthcare Communication.
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a University of Illinois at Chicago. $b Disability and Human Development. $3 3187935
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03A.
790 $a 0799
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27603242