東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially G...

Zhou, Ting.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game./
作者:	Zhou, Ting.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	139 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-02A.
標題:	Instructional design. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10977824
ISBN:	9781085562232

The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game.
Zhou, Ting.

The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 139 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to explore the variables that might affect the learning outcomes of a serious game for disaster preparedness. Literature review in the field has revealed a number of variables that might have effects on the learning outcome with serious games, including: prior knowledge, in game guidance, gaming frequency, and playing skills. However, there has been no study on the relationships and effects between the types of knowledge (i.e., declarative, or procedural) used in serious games and the intended learning outcomes. Using disaster preparedness as a learning context, this study examines the two types of knowledge: (1) declarative (i.e., learners' ability to retain facts and information), and (2) procedural knowledge (learners' ability to perform actions and procedures), and their relationships with the learning outcomes of a serious game. The research question was: "To what extent do: prior knowledge, in-game guidance, and gaming frequency, predict the learning outcomes, in the forms of declarative and procedural knowledge of a disaster preparedness serious game?" This study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, participants played a serious game in either the fully or partially guided mode to learn to assemble an emergency supply kit. Data collected in this stage included participants' prior knowledge on disaster preparedness, the types of in-game guidance received, and their game-playing frequency. In Stage Two, the participants played an assessment game, in which they needed to gather emergency supplies and prepare for a disaster in a new town. Data collected in this stage included their declarative and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge was measured by the number of correct items a participant has gathered, and procedural knowledge was measured by the Expert Similarity Index (ESI), a method that compared the performance similarities between a participant and a designated expert. At the end of Stage Two, all participants completed a qualitative picture test and provided answers for the researcher to better understand their in-game decisions. In total, sixty-two participants completed the study. Separate multiple regression analyses of whether (1) prior knowledge, (2) in-game guidance, and (3) gaming frequency were significant predictors for learning outcomes in (a) declarative, and (b) procedural knowledge were conducted in SPSS. An interaction between prior knowledge and in-game guidance was added into the multiple regression model as an independent variable to examine whether a moderator effect existed. Results showed that gaming frequency was not a significant predictor for either declarative or procedural knowledge. Whereas, prior knowledge and its interaction term with in-game guidance were significant predictors. In-game guidance was a significant predictor for declarative knowledge, as well as the procedural knowledge at higher rounds of the gameplay. The significant interaction term between prior knowledge and in-game guidance revealed a moderator effect, indicated that the relationship between a participant's prior knowledge and learning outcomes was moderated by the (partial or full) guidance received in-game. Findings further revealed a "learner planning effect" in this study.

ISBN: 9781085562232Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172279
Instructional design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Assessment

The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game.
LDR:04570nmm a2200373 4500 001 2266494
005 20200612084422.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085562232
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10977824
035 $a AAI10977824
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Zhou, Ting. $3 1670060
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Fully Vs. Partially Guided Learning on Declarative and Procedural Knowledge with a Disaster Preparedness Serious Game.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 139 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Loh, Christian S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore the variables that might affect the learning outcomes of a serious game for disaster preparedness. Literature review in the field has revealed a number of variables that might have effects on the learning outcome with serious games, including: prior knowledge, in game guidance, gaming frequency, and playing skills. However, there has been no study on the relationships and effects between the types of knowledge (i.e., declarative, or procedural) used in serious games and the intended learning outcomes. Using disaster preparedness as a learning context, this study examines the two types of knowledge: (1) declarative (i.e., learners' ability to retain facts and information), and (2) procedural knowledge (learners' ability to perform actions and procedures), and their relationships with the learning outcomes of a serious game. The research question was: "To what extent do: prior knowledge, in-game guidance, and gaming frequency, predict the learning outcomes, in the forms of declarative and procedural knowledge of a disaster preparedness serious game?" This study was conducted in two stages. In stage one, participants played a serious game in either the fully or partially guided mode to learn to assemble an emergency supply kit. Data collected in this stage included participants' prior knowledge on disaster preparedness, the types of in-game guidance received, and their game-playing frequency. In Stage Two, the participants played an assessment game, in which they needed to gather emergency supplies and prepare for a disaster in a new town. Data collected in this stage included their declarative and procedural knowledge. Declarative knowledge was measured by the number of correct items a participant has gathered, and procedural knowledge was measured by the Expert Similarity Index (ESI), a method that compared the performance similarities between a participant and a designated expert. At the end of Stage Two, all participants completed a qualitative picture test and provided answers for the researcher to better understand their in-game decisions. In total, sixty-two participants completed the study. Separate multiple regression analyses of whether (1) prior knowledge, (2) in-game guidance, and (3) gaming frequency were significant predictors for learning outcomes in (a) declarative, and (b) procedural knowledge were conducted in SPSS. An interaction between prior knowledge and in-game guidance was added into the multiple regression model as an independent variable to examine whether a moderator effect existed. Results showed that gaming frequency was not a significant predictor for either declarative or procedural knowledge. Whereas, prior knowledge and its interaction term with in-game guidance were significant predictors. In-game guidance was a significant predictor for declarative knowledge, as well as the procedural knowledge at higher rounds of the gameplay. The significant interaction term between prior knowledge and in-game guidance revealed a moderator effect, indicated that the relationship between a participant's prior knowledge and learning outcomes was moderated by the (partial or full) guidance received in-game. Findings further revealed a "learner planning effect" in this study.
590 $a School code: 0209.
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
653 $a Assessment
653 $a Digital game-based learning
653 $a Disaster preparedness training
653 $a Learning outcomes
653 $a Learning theories
653 $a Serious game
690 $a 0447
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 1018013
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-02A.
790 $a 0209
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10977824