東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An Analysis of the Results of Court ...

Birren, Genevieve F. E.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008./
Author:	Birren, Genevieve F. E.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	133 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03A.
Subject:	Sports management. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10843021
ISBN:	9781085776608

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
Birren, Genevieve F. E.

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 133 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to create a database of Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) awards coded for a variety of factors and then examine those factors to determine whether they had any relationship to the outcome of the CAS awards involving athletes and doping. The initial pool of awards was downloaded from the CAS website and then each award was read and coded for certain information, specifically case name, year, date decided, division, sport, party role, party name, issue, rule applied, sex, decision, and arbitrators deciding. Once this coding was complete the result was a database of 216 CAS awards. All awards that had doping as the issue were then selected for analysis to see what factors had a relationship with the final decision in the award. Using descriptive statistics and case study analysis, the results indicate that there are differences in award outcomes between different sports, the sexes, who the arbitrators are, and the type of doping involved, among others, suggesting some potential bias in CAS decisions. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.

ISBN: 9781085776608Subjects--Topical Terms:

3423935
Sports management.

An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
LDR:02122nmm a2200301 4500 001 2265246
005 20200514111937.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085776608
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10843021
035 $a AAI10843021
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Birren, Genevieve F. E. $3 3542402
245 1 3 $a An Analysis of the Results of Court of Arbitration for Sports Doping Awards Involving Athletes between 1994 and 2008.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 133 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Seidler, Todd.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of New Mexico, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to create a database of Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) awards coded for a variety of factors and then examine those factors to determine whether they had any relationship to the outcome of the CAS awards involving athletes and doping. The initial pool of awards was downloaded from the CAS website and then each award was read and coded for certain information, specifically case name, year, date decided, division, sport, party role, party name, issue, rule applied, sex, decision, and arbitrators deciding. Once this coding was complete the result was a database of 216 CAS awards. All awards that had doping as the issue were then selected for analysis to see what factors had a relationship with the final decision in the award. Using descriptive statistics and case study analysis, the results indicate that there are differences in award outcomes between different sports, the sexes, who the arbitrators are, and the type of doping involved, among others, suggesting some potential bias in CAS decisions. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0142.
650 4 $a Sports management. $3 3423935
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0430
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a The University of New Mexico. $b Physical Education, Sports and Exercise Sciences. $3 1676358
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03A.
790 $a 0142
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10843021