東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on ...

Stocki, Elliott.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes./
作者:	Stocki, Elliott.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	45 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-11.
標題:	Educational evaluation. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13858974
ISBN:	9781392146750

Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes.
Stocki, Elliott.

Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 45 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11.

Thesis (M.A.)--Middle Tennessee State University, 2019.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

The current study investigated the effects of a two-part reading intervention on reading outcomes of a struggling reader using a single-subject design. One part of the intervention included direct-instruction through a manualized vocabulary program with an emphasis on morphology. The second part of the intervention included indirect-instruction through repeated reading of passages with phrase drill error correction. Outcomes were measured using three formative assessments (i.e., DIBEL Next oral reading fluency, DIBELS Next maze passages, and an affix identification task). Additionally, three summative measures of morphological awareness were used (i.e., nonsense word analysis, cloze sentences, and affix spelling). Additionally, participant perceptions of the program were collected using surveys both before and after the implementation of the program. Regarding his performance on the formative CBM assessment, the participant had a positive rate of improvement in the trend of the data from baseline through the intervention for both reading comprehension (g-index = 0.67) and oral reading fluency (g-index = 0.33). The participant also had improvements on formative measures of morphological awareness throughout the intervention. Regarding summative assessments, the participant made minimal gains on two of the pre/post morphological awareness measures. The participant reported negative perceptions of the intervention.

ISBN: 9781392146750Subjects--Topical Terms:

526425
Educational evaluation.

Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes.
LDR:02599nmm a2200373 4500 001 2264037
005 20200410130114.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392146750
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13858974
035 $a (MiAaPQ)mtsu:11152
035 $a AAI13858974
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stocki, Elliott. $3 3541135
245 1 0 $a Impact of Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Outcomes.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 45 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Holt, Aimee.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Middle Tennessee State University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The current study investigated the effects of a two-part reading intervention on reading outcomes of a struggling reader using a single-subject design. One part of the intervention included direct-instruction through a manualized vocabulary program with an emphasis on morphology. The second part of the intervention included indirect-instruction through repeated reading of passages with phrase drill error correction. Outcomes were measured using three formative assessments (i.e., DIBEL Next oral reading fluency, DIBELS Next maze passages, and an affix identification task). Additionally, three summative measures of morphological awareness were used (i.e., nonsense word analysis, cloze sentences, and affix spelling). Additionally, participant perceptions of the program were collected using surveys both before and after the implementation of the program. Regarding his performance on the formative CBM assessment, the participant had a positive rate of improvement in the trend of the data from baseline through the intervention for both reading comprehension (g-index = 0.67) and oral reading fluency (g-index = 0.33). The participant also had improvements on formative measures of morphological awareness throughout the intervention. Regarding summative assessments, the participant made minimal gains on two of the pre/post morphological awareness measures. The participant reported negative perceptions of the intervention.
590 $a School code: 0170.
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 516948
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0620
690 $a 0633
710 2 $a Middle Tennessee State University. $b Psychology. $3 2099144
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-11.
790 $a 0170
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13858974