東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Legal culture, legality and the dete...

Malsukhum, Voraphol.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia/ by Voraphol Malsukhum.
Author:	Malsukhum, Voraphol.
Published:	Singapore :Springer Singapore : : 2021.,
Description:	xxvi, 269 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Chapter 1. Comparative Doctrinal Analysis of Legal Reasoning in the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review in the Light of Deep-Water Legality and Legal Culture: A Methodological Framework -- Chapter 2. Differences between English and Australian Legal Cultures -- Chapter 3. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Error of Law and Jurisdictional Error -- Chapter 4. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Jurisdictional Fact -- Chapter 5. Influence of the Legal Cultures on the Grounds relating to Substantive Exercise of Discretion -- Chapter 6. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Legitimate Expectations -- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Judicial review - England. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1267-1
ISBN:	9789811612671

Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia
Malsukhum, Voraphol.

Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia[electronic resource] /by Voraphol Malsukhum. - Singapore :Springer Singapore :2021. - xxvi, 269 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

Chapter 1. Comparative Doctrinal Analysis of Legal Reasoning in the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review in the Light of Deep-Water Legality and Legal Culture: A Methodological Framework -- Chapter 2. Differences between English and Australian Legal Cultures -- Chapter 3. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Error of Law and Jurisdictional Error -- Chapter 4. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Jurisdictional Fact -- Chapter 5. Influence of the Legal Cultures on the Grounds relating to Substantive Exercise of Discretion -- Chapter 6. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Legitimate Expectations -- Chapter 7. Conclusion.

This book presents a navigating framework of legal culture and legality to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the English and Australian determination of the grounds of judicial review. This book facilitates tangible process of how and why jurisdictional error, jurisdictional fact, proportionality and substantive legitimate expectations are debatable in English law, while they are either completely rejected or firmly entrenched in Australian law. This book argues that these differences are not just random. Legality is not just a fig-leaf, but is profoundly rooted in legal systems' legal culture; hence, it dictates the way in which courts empower, justify, constrain or limit the scope of judicial review. This book presents evidence that courts differ in legal systems and apply diverse ways to determine the scope of judicial review based on their deep understanding of legality, which is embedded in the legal culture of their legal system. This book uses comparative methodology and develops this framework between English and Australian law. Although obvious and important, this book presents a kind of examination that has never been undertaken in this depth and detail before.

ISBN: 9789811612671

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-981-16-1267-1doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1616545
Judicial review
--England.

LC Class. No.: KD4902 / .M357 2021

Dewey Class. No.: 347.42012

Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia
LDR:02894nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2244798
003 DE-He213
005 20210702190900.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 211207s2021 si s 0 eng d
020 $a 9789811612671 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9789811612664 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-981-16-1267-1 $2 doi
035 $a 978-981-16-1267-1
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KD4902 $b .M357 2021
072 7 $a LND $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW018000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LND $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.42012 $2 23
090 $a KD4902 $b .M259 2021
100 1 $a Malsukhum, Voraphol. $3 3506019
245 1 0 $a Legal culture, legality and the determination of the grounds of judicial review of administrative action in England and Australia $h [electronic resource] / $c by Voraphol Malsukhum.
260 $a Singapore : $b Springer Singapore : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2021.
300 $a xxvi, 269 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Comparative Doctrinal Analysis of Legal Reasoning in the Determination of the Grounds of Judicial Review in the Light of Deep-Water Legality and Legal Culture: A Methodological Framework -- Chapter 2. Differences between English and Australian Legal Cultures -- Chapter 3. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Error of Law and Jurisdictional Error -- Chapter 4. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Jurisdictional Fact -- Chapter 5. Influence of the Legal Cultures on the Grounds relating to Substantive Exercise of Discretion -- Chapter 6. Influence of the Legal Cultures on Legitimate Expectations -- Chapter 7. Conclusion.
520 $a This book presents a navigating framework of legal culture and legality to facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the English and Australian determination of the grounds of judicial review. This book facilitates tangible process of how and why jurisdictional error, jurisdictional fact, proportionality and substantive legitimate expectations are debatable in English law, while they are either completely rejected or firmly entrenched in Australian law. This book argues that these differences are not just random. Legality is not just a fig-leaf, but is profoundly rooted in legal systems' legal culture; hence, it dictates the way in which courts empower, justify, constrain or limit the scope of judicial review. This book presents evidence that courts differ in legal systems and apply diverse ways to determine the scope of judicial review based on their deep understanding of legality, which is embedded in the legal culture of their legal system. This book uses comparative methodology and develops this framework between English and Australian law. Although obvious and important, this book presents a kind of examination that has never been undertaken in this depth and detail before.
650 0 $a Judicial review $z England. $3 1616545
650 0 $a Judicial review $z Australia. $3 3506020
650 1 4 $a Constitutional Law. $3 896981
650 2 4 $a Legislative and Executive Politics. $3 3219859
650 2 4 $a Governance and Government. $3 3220859
650 2 4 $a International Relations. $3 895651
650 2 4 $a Administrative Law. $3 896334
650 2 4 $a Public Law. $3 897067
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1267-1
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)