東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Teachers' Bullying Definitions and S...

Chiappe, Jenny Chow.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs).

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs)./
作者:	Chiappe, Jenny Chow.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	114 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Educational sociology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13898967
ISBN:	9781392287699

Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs).
Chiappe, Jenny Chow.

Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs). - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 114 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2019.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Students with disabilities are more likely to be victimized compared to their peers without disabilities. However, not many studies have examined how general education teachers address bullying of students with disabilities in general education placements. This study used an explanatory mixed methods design and examined strategy use based on disability category, the relationship between strategy type and type of bullying, completeness of teacher bullying definition as a moderator between years of teaching experience and strategy frequency, and teachers' view of social exclusion as a form of bullying. The study was completed in multiple phases: expert review, survey, and teacher interviews. The research participants included 114 general education teachers in public elementary schools. Six teachers were selected from the sample and completed individual interviews. Type of bullying was coded as indirect (relational bullying: social exclusion) and direct bullying (physical: hitting; verbal: name calling). The teachers rated the frequency use of 10 strategies for each type of bullying, which were then recoded to 3 strategy levels (school level: refer to school rules and refer to administrative team; class level: change seating arrangement, teach lessons, refer to class rules, teach communication and social skills; and individual level: refer to counselor, refer to parent, handle it, and refer to special education teacher). The completeness of teacher bullying definition was measured by coding the bullying definition the participants provided which was then converted to a percentage based on the definition found in the literature. The analyses included an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), moderation analysis, and thematic analysis. There was a significant association between strategy type and frequency of strategy use. Teachers were less likely to use individual level strategies compared to class and school level strategies. Completeness of bullying definition also moderated the relationship between years of teaching experience and strategy use. Teachers in the interviews expressed 3 themes: varying definition and reasons for bullying, lack of supports to address bullying, and social exclusion can be easily missed. Implications of this study contribute to the existing limited literature on bullying of students with disabilities and to the understanding of how general education teachers are addressing the bullying of students with disabilities.

ISBN: 9781392287699Subjects--Topical Terms:

519608
Educational sociology.

Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs).
LDR:03710nmm a2200337 4500 001 2210248
005 20191121113053.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392287699
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13898967
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucla:17956
035 $a AAI13898967
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chiappe, Jenny Chow. $3 3437390
245 1 0 $a Teachers' Bullying Definitions and Strategies to Address the Bullying of Students with Individualized Education Program (IEPs).
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 114 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Graham, Sandra H.;Weinberg, Lois A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Students with disabilities are more likely to be victimized compared to their peers without disabilities. However, not many studies have examined how general education teachers address bullying of students with disabilities in general education placements. This study used an explanatory mixed methods design and examined strategy use based on disability category, the relationship between strategy type and type of bullying, completeness of teacher bullying definition as a moderator between years of teaching experience and strategy frequency, and teachers' view of social exclusion as a form of bullying. The study was completed in multiple phases: expert review, survey, and teacher interviews. The research participants included 114 general education teachers in public elementary schools. Six teachers were selected from the sample and completed individual interviews. Type of bullying was coded as indirect (relational bullying: social exclusion) and direct bullying (physical: hitting; verbal: name calling). The teachers rated the frequency use of 10 strategies for each type of bullying, which were then recoded to 3 strategy levels (school level: refer to school rules and refer to administrative team; class level: change seating arrangement, teach lessons, refer to class rules, teach communication and social skills; and individual level: refer to counselor, refer to parent, handle it, and refer to special education teacher). The completeness of teacher bullying definition was measured by coding the bullying definition the participants provided which was then converted to a percentage based on the definition found in the literature. The analyses included an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), moderation analysis, and thematic analysis. There was a significant association between strategy type and frequency of strategy use. Teachers were less likely to use individual level strategies compared to class and school level strategies. Completeness of bullying definition also moderated the relationship between years of teaching experience and strategy use. Teachers in the interviews expressed 3 themes: varying definition and reasons for bullying, lack of supports to address bullying, and social exclusion can be easily missed. Implications of this study contribute to the existing limited literature on bullying of students with disabilities and to the understanding of how general education teachers are addressing the bullying of students with disabilities.
590 $a School code: 0031.
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 519608
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
690 $a 0340
690 $a 0529
710 2 $a University of California, Los Angeles. $b Special Education. $3 3353357
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0031
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13898967