東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Exploring Multilingual Writers' Pref...

Roy, Sukanto.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class./
Author:	Roy, Sukanto.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	174 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-11A.
Subject:	Language arts. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13859498
ISBN:	9781392099933

Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class.
Roy, Sukanto.

Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 174 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study fills the existing gap in the research, which indicates that few researchers have examined multilingual writers' preference between audio and written feedback, and the impact of feedback format on their revision process. However, this dissertation has five interrelated purposes: 1. To understand the expectations of multilingual writers from instructors' feedback, 2. to understand multilingual writers' perceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of audio and written feedback, 3. to learn about their perceptions of the effectiveness of audio and written feedback on their revision process, 4. to examine the distinguishable impacts of audio and written feedback on multilingual writers' revision process, and 5. to explore multilingual writers' preferred form of feedback between audio and written feedback. To fulfill these purposes, eight multilingual writers were interviewed, and their first drafts and revised drafts of the final research paper on which they received audio and written feedback were compared using the "Compare" option in Microsoft Word. In addition to these, an early semester participatory survey and a reflection survey were conducted among the multilingual writers of a composition course. Results indicated that multilingual writers expected directive explicit feedback from their instructors. They pointed out that audio feedback was better for global commentary, and written feedback was better for local commentary. Their perceptions regarding the effectivities of audio and written feedback on their revision process varied depending on their own self-efficacy. There was no significant impact of the feedback format on their revision process. A positive correlation was discovered between their preferred form of feedback and their self-perceived English listening proficiency. Those who were confident about their English listening proficiency preferred audio feedback over written feedback. The results of this dissertation have immediate implications for L2 writing instructors. This study suggests that L2 writing instructors should adopt the system of providing a combined form of feedback of both audio and written in order to enhance multilingual writers' overall writing skills. It also suggests that L2 writing instructors should consider giving some relevant grammar lessons for their students. Finally, the author recommends to further investigate the potential of audio feedback in creating student-teacher connections, particularly in online composition courses.

ISBN: 9781392099933Subjects--Topical Terms:

532624
Language arts.

Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class.
LDR:03750nmm a2200349 4500 001 2209075
005 20191025102646.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392099933
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13859498
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iup:11866
035 $a AAI13859498
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Roy, Sukanto. $3 3436155
245 1 0 $a Exploring Multilingual Writers' Preference Between Audio and Written Feedback, and the Impact of Feedback Format on Their Revision Process in a U.S.Composition Class.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 174 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Vetter, Matthew A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study fills the existing gap in the research, which indicates that few researchers have examined multilingual writers' preference between audio and written feedback, and the impact of feedback format on their revision process. However, this dissertation has five interrelated purposes: 1. To understand the expectations of multilingual writers from instructors' feedback, 2. to understand multilingual writers' perceptions regarding the advantages and disadvantages of audio and written feedback, 3. to learn about their perceptions of the effectiveness of audio and written feedback on their revision process, 4. to examine the distinguishable impacts of audio and written feedback on multilingual writers' revision process, and 5. to explore multilingual writers' preferred form of feedback between audio and written feedback. To fulfill these purposes, eight multilingual writers were interviewed, and their first drafts and revised drafts of the final research paper on which they received audio and written feedback were compared using the "Compare" option in Microsoft Word. In addition to these, an early semester participatory survey and a reflection survey were conducted among the multilingual writers of a composition course. Results indicated that multilingual writers expected directive explicit feedback from their instructors. They pointed out that audio feedback was better for global commentary, and written feedback was better for local commentary. Their perceptions regarding the effectivities of audio and written feedback on their revision process varied depending on their own self-efficacy. There was no significant impact of the feedback format on their revision process. A positive correlation was discovered between their preferred form of feedback and their self-perceived English listening proficiency. Those who were confident about their English listening proficiency preferred audio feedback over written feedback. The results of this dissertation have immediate implications for L2 writing instructors. This study suggests that L2 writing instructors should adopt the system of providing a combined form of feedback of both audio and written in order to enhance multilingual writers' overall writing skills. It also suggests that L2 writing instructors should consider giving some relevant grammar lessons for their students. Finally, the author recommends to further investigate the potential of audio feedback in creating student-teacher connections, particularly in online composition courses.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a English as a Second Language. $3 3423938
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 526425
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b English. $3 1026395
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-11A.
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13859498