東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Practitioner Research Study Explor...

Hushmendy, Dilnavaz F.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom./
作者:	Hushmendy, Dilnavaz F.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	185 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International79-12A.
標題:	Secondary education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809620
ISBN:	9780438026223

A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom.
Hushmendy, Dilnavaz F.

A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 185 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation is a qualitative practitioner research study in which I explore how my students and I engage in critical literacy using sociopolitical Articles of the Week (AoWs). Critical literacy is the ability to read, write, and speak about texts in a reflective manner to better understand power, inequality, and injustice that prevails in the world. The two major questions that drove this study were: (1) How are eleventh-grade students' perspectives evident in their discussions and reflective papers? (2) How do my students and I take up the opportunity to pursue a social action project in response to Articles of the Week? The twenty-two research participants for this study were students in one of my three eleventh-grade English classes. While I used AoWs in all three eleventh-grade sections, I conducted my research in only one of these sections. This class differed from the other two sections only in that these students planned and implemented their social action projects in groups in lieu of individual presentations of their research paper in the other two classes. I collected six kinds of data: (1) scanned copies of students' eight reflective papers based on AoWs; (2) transcriptions of eight video-recorded AoW discussions; (3) teacher journal; (4) students' post AoW surveys; (5) scanned copies and/or photographs of students' social action projects; and (6) transcription of a post social-action whole class video recorded discussion. I collected these data in four phases from October 2015 to June 2016. Every week, over eight weeks (October-December), students read an AoW. After, and as homework, they wrote a reflective paper and brought it to class at the end of the week (Friday), when we had a whole-class discussion. After reading eight AoWs, students chose and researched a social action, researching daily for six weeks. This six-week research project resulted in a research paper that satisfied the research requirement of the eleventh-grade English class. Finally, two days per week for five weeks, students implemented their group social action projects on these topics: (a) Gun control laws, (b) Syrian Refugees, and (3) School Start Later. Using the constructivist grounded theory technique (Charmaz, 2000, 2006) and the two methodological frameworks-practitioner research and inquiry as stance (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009)-as well as the four dimensions of critical literacy (Lewison, Flint & Sluys, 2002) to analyze and interpret my data, the following findings emerged: Findings to research question 1-most students appreciated considering multiple perspectives, both in writing and discussion. Students' discussions demonstrated strong knowledge building in the following areas: incidental knowledge building; knowledge building with immediate effects; knowledge building by geography; and knowledge building as deliberation and debate. Findings to research question 2-social action projects involved two major activities: procedural activities and negotiating power. The procedural activities involved choosing a social action project, researching, and working in groups to implement the social action projects. The power analysis in this study revealed that examining multiple perspectives and including them in social action projects can work positively for students-social networks opened for students who provided a balanced perspective on topics. For students taking a one-sided perspective, social networks shut down. The results of this study have the potential to inform future practitioner researchers and critical pedagogues to develop new ways of building a critically reflective classroom that allows for robust social transformations that could influence educational policies because teachers' voices do matter.

ISBN: 9780438026223Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122779
Secondary education.

A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom.
LDR:04885nmm a2200325 4500 001 2208968
005 20191025102623.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438026223
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10809620
035 $a (MiAaPQ)sunyalb:12354
035 $a AAI10809620
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hushmendy, Dilnavaz F. $3 3436044
245 1 0 $a A Practitioner Research Study Exploring Critical Literacy in a Secondary English Classroom.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 185 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Sheehy, Margaret R.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation is a qualitative practitioner research study in which I explore how my students and I engage in critical literacy using sociopolitical Articles of the Week (AoWs). Critical literacy is the ability to read, write, and speak about texts in a reflective manner to better understand power, inequality, and injustice that prevails in the world. The two major questions that drove this study were: (1) How are eleventh-grade students' perspectives evident in their discussions and reflective papers? (2) How do my students and I take up the opportunity to pursue a social action project in response to Articles of the Week? The twenty-two research participants for this study were students in one of my three eleventh-grade English classes. While I used AoWs in all three eleventh-grade sections, I conducted my research in only one of these sections. This class differed from the other two sections only in that these students planned and implemented their social action projects in groups in lieu of individual presentations of their research paper in the other two classes. I collected six kinds of data: (1) scanned copies of students' eight reflective papers based on AoWs; (2) transcriptions of eight video-recorded AoW discussions; (3) teacher journal; (4) students' post AoW surveys; (5) scanned copies and/or photographs of students' social action projects; and (6) transcription of a post social-action whole class video recorded discussion. I collected these data in four phases from October 2015 to June 2016. Every week, over eight weeks (October-December), students read an AoW. After, and as homework, they wrote a reflective paper and brought it to class at the end of the week (Friday), when we had a whole-class discussion. After reading eight AoWs, students chose and researched a social action, researching daily for six weeks. This six-week research project resulted in a research paper that satisfied the research requirement of the eleventh-grade English class. Finally, two days per week for five weeks, students implemented their group social action projects on these topics: (a) Gun control laws, (b) Syrian Refugees, and (3) School Start Later. Using the constructivist grounded theory technique (Charmaz, 2000, 2006) and the two methodological frameworks-practitioner research and inquiry as stance (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 2009)-as well as the four dimensions of critical literacy (Lewison, Flint & Sluys, 2002) to analyze and interpret my data, the following findings emerged: Findings to research question 1-most students appreciated considering multiple perspectives, both in writing and discussion. Students' discussions demonstrated strong knowledge building in the following areas: incidental knowledge building; knowledge building with immediate effects; knowledge building by geography; and knowledge building as deliberation and debate. Findings to research question 2-social action projects involved two major activities: procedural activities and negotiating power. The procedural activities involved choosing a social action project, researching, and working in groups to implement the social action projects. The power analysis in this study revealed that examining multiple perspectives and including them in social action projects can work positively for students-social networks opened for students who provided a balanced perspective on topics. For students taking a one-sided perspective, social networks shut down. The results of this study have the potential to inform future practitioner researchers and critical pedagogues to develop new ways of building a critically reflective classroom that allows for robust social transformations that could influence educational policies because teachers' voices do matter.
590 $a School code: 0668.
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a State University of New York at Albany. $b Literacy Teaching and Learning (Reading). $3 3436045
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 79-12A.
790 $a 0668
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10809620