東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Advancing the Practice of Implementa...

Stevens, Elizabeth R.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community./
Author:	Stevens, Elizabeth R.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	125 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-07B.
Subject:	Public Health Education. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13423098
ISBN:	9780438744325

Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community.
Stevens, Elizabeth R.

Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 125 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University College of Global Public Health, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Implementation science (IS) has the potential to serve an important role in encouraging the successful implementation of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. To advance the use of IS increased engagement of researchers is needed, however, the current state of IS awareness and engagement among health researchers is relatively unknown. Additionally, engagement in IS is a multifaceted issue and barriers to IS engagement have not as of yet been studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate health researcher engagement in IS research practices and determine the barriers and facilitators to engagement in IS research. The research questions were answered using a mixed-methods approach, which included administering an online survey of health researchers in the United States (U.S.) and conducting semi-structured telephone interviews of a subset of survey respondents. Engagement in and awareness of IS were measured with multiple questionnaire items that both directly and indirectly ask about using IS methods. Unrecognized IS engagement was defined as participating in research using IS elements and not indicating IS as methods used. Potential barriers and facilitators tested included (1) knowledge and awareness of IS, (2) attitudes about IS research, (3) career benefits of IS, (4) research community support, and (5) research leadership support. Analyses included descriptive data analysis, simple logistic regressions, and multivariable linear regression models of researcher characteristics, IS engagement, and potential factors as predictors of IS engagement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for qualitative data analyses. The survey and interview responses received show awareness of IS is common among health researchers, however, there is also a high prevalence of unrecognized IS engagement and significant barriers to engaging in IS research exist. Efforts to expand IS training opportunities to increase researcher familiarity with IS methods and foster support for IS within research communities, along with decreasing barriers to funding and publishing are likely to be most effective for increasing engagement in IS research. Further research is needed to determine how to address the factors that limit IS engagement.

ISBN: 9780438744325Subjects--Topical Terms:

3432608
Public Health Education.

Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community.
LDR:03480nmm a2200325 4500 001 2208598
005 20191021073729.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438744325
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13423098
035 $a (MiAaPQ)nyuhealth:10003
035 $a AAI13423098
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Stevens, Elizabeth R. $3 3435638
245 1 0 $a Advancing the Practice of Implementation Science: An Evaluation of the Factors Contributing to the Use of Implementation Science in the Health Research Community.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 125 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-07, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Boden-Albala, Bernadette.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University College of Global Public Health, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Implementation science (IS) has the potential to serve an important role in encouraging the successful implementation of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. To advance the use of IS increased engagement of researchers is needed, however, the current state of IS awareness and engagement among health researchers is relatively unknown. Additionally, engagement in IS is a multifaceted issue and barriers to IS engagement have not as of yet been studied. The aim of this study is to evaluate health researcher engagement in IS research practices and determine the barriers and facilitators to engagement in IS research. The research questions were answered using a mixed-methods approach, which included administering an online survey of health researchers in the United States (U.S.) and conducting semi-structured telephone interviews of a subset of survey respondents. Engagement in and awareness of IS were measured with multiple questionnaire items that both directly and indirectly ask about using IS methods. Unrecognized IS engagement was defined as participating in research using IS elements and not indicating IS as methods used. Potential barriers and facilitators tested included (1) knowledge and awareness of IS, (2) attitudes about IS research, (3) career benefits of IS, (4) research community support, and (5) research leadership support. Analyses included descriptive data analysis, simple logistic regressions, and multivariable linear regression models of researcher characteristics, IS engagement, and potential factors as predictors of IS engagement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for qualitative data analyses. The survey and interview responses received show awareness of IS is common among health researchers, however, there is also a high prevalence of unrecognized IS engagement and significant barriers to engaging in IS research exist. Efforts to expand IS training opportunities to increase researcher familiarity with IS methods and foster support for IS within research communities, along with decreasing barriers to funding and publishing are likely to be most effective for increasing engagement in IS research. Further research is needed to determine how to address the factors that limit IS engagement.
590 $a School code: 1963.
650 4 $a Public Health Education. $3 3432608
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
690 $a 0500
690 $a 0573
710 2 $a New York University College of Global Public Health. $b Epidemiology. $3 3435639
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-07B.
790 $a 1963
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13423098