東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

An investigation of the quality of s...

Hole, Katherine.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations./
Author:	Hole, Katherine.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2015,
Description:	115 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International77-03A.
Subject:	Educational tests & measurements. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3713528
ISBN:	9781321900712

An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations.
Hole, Katherine.

An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2015 - 115 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2015.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Doctoral dissertation research has been criticized for its quality and contribution to scholarly research. Commonalities between doctoral research and reviews of published articles indicate a lack of psychometric reporting practices of those utilizing instrumentation. Surveys, specifically those that are self-developed, have not been examined in doctoral research. Multiple sources advise researchers who create their own surveys for data collection to follow specific item writing and rating scale development guidelines. This previous research led to the investigation of student-developed surveys and rating scales in doctoral dissertations, and the psychometric reporting practices of the students, to identify trends in graduate research. Two-hundred forty-six doctoral dissertations were examined, which included the use of 280 self-developed surveys. Specific guidelines were created for assessing the survey characteristics and students' reporting of psychometric properties. The survey items and rating scale characteristics were considered favorable; the authors mostly adhered to survey development guidelines. The frequency of students who validated their surveys was superb. However, the lack of reliability reporting by students calls into question not only the knowledge and experience with reliability methods of the students and their committee members, but also the psychometric training students experience in graduate school.

ISBN: 9781321900712Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168483
Educational tests & measurements.

An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations.
LDR:02683nmm a2200349 4500 001 2208348
005 20191010070918.5
008 201008s2015 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781321900712
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3713528
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ku:13949
035 $a AAI3713528
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hole, Katherine. $3 3435380
245 1 3 $a An investigation of the quality of student-developed surveys and rating scales and psychometric reporting practices in doctoral dissertations.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2015
300 $a 115 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 77-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Frey, Bruce.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Kansas, 2015.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Doctoral dissertation research has been criticized for its quality and contribution to scholarly research. Commonalities between doctoral research and reviews of published articles indicate a lack of psychometric reporting practices of those utilizing instrumentation. Surveys, specifically those that are self-developed, have not been examined in doctoral research. Multiple sources advise researchers who create their own surveys for data collection to follow specific item writing and rating scale development guidelines. This previous research led to the investigation of student-developed surveys and rating scales in doctoral dissertations, and the psychometric reporting practices of the students, to identify trends in graduate research. Two-hundred forty-six doctoral dissertations were examined, which included the use of 280 self-developed surveys. Specific guidelines were created for assessing the survey characteristics and students' reporting of psychometric properties. The survey items and rating scale characteristics were considered favorable; the authors mostly adhered to survey development guidelines. The frequency of students who validated their surveys was superb. However, the lack of reliability reporting by students calls into question not only the knowledge and experience with reliability methods of the students and their committee members, but also the psychometric training students experience in graduate school.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 3168483
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0288
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Psychology and Research in Education. $3 3186316
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 77-03A.
790 $a 0099
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2015
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3713528