東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Ad...

Larson, Aaron.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis./
作者:	Larson, Aaron.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	57 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-10B.
標題:	Physical therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13813308
ISBN:	9781392027486

The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis.
Larson, Aaron.

The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 57 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.

Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2019.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of long term disability for adults and costs the healthcare system 34 billion dollars annually.1-3 Directly after a stroke up to 85% of survivors have an impairment of the upper extremity.4 Previous research has shown mirror therapy (MT) is beneficial for improving function in the upper extremity.5-16 Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of MT in addition to conventional therapy (CT) versus CT alone in the different stages of stroke rehabilitation including the acute and chronic. 5,7-17 Methods: A literature review was conducted in the fall of 2018 and consisted of the following databases: Pubmed, Medline, and CINAHL. The studies were assessed and reviewed on the specified inclusion/exclusion criteria. A fixed effect size model of 2 groups was used for the included studies to generate the Q-value, P-value, effect size, and confidence interval. Results: The results favored MT in addition to CT as compared to CT alone in all stages of stroke rehabilitation. MT in addition to CT used in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation was favored over MT in addition to CT used in the chronic stage of stroke rehabilitation. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports current literature that MT in addition to CT is more effective in improving upper extremity function than CT alone in all stages of stroke rehabilitation. The minimal to moderate effect found in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation suggests that MT in addition to CT is more beneficial in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation as compared to use in the chronic stage of stroke rehabilitation. The evidence should, however, be interpreted with caution until further studies are included.

ISBN: 9781392027486Subjects--Topical Terms:

588713
Physical therapy.

The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis.
LDR:03003nmm a2200325 4500 001 2207276
005 20190916101812.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392027486
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13813308
035 $a (MiAaPQ)csu:10672
035 $a AAI13813308
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Larson, Aaron. $3 3434244
245 1 4 $a The Efficacy of Mirror Therapy in Addition to Conventional Therapy Versus CT Alone in the Acute and Chronic Stages of Stroke Based on the Action Research and Arm Test: A Meta-analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 57 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Adame-Walker, Jennifer.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.T.)--California State University, Fresno, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Background: Stroke is one of the leading causes of long term disability for adults and costs the healthcare system 34 billion dollars annually.1-3 Directly after a stroke up to 85% of survivors have an impairment of the upper extremity.4 Previous research has shown mirror therapy (MT) is beneficial for improving function in the upper extremity.5-16 Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of MT in addition to conventional therapy (CT) versus CT alone in the different stages of stroke rehabilitation including the acute and chronic. 5,7-17 Methods: A literature review was conducted in the fall of 2018 and consisted of the following databases: Pubmed, Medline, and CINAHL. The studies were assessed and reviewed on the specified inclusion/exclusion criteria. A fixed effect size model of 2 groups was used for the included studies to generate the Q-value, P-value, effect size, and confidence interval. Results: The results favored MT in addition to CT as compared to CT alone in all stages of stroke rehabilitation. MT in addition to CT used in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation was favored over MT in addition to CT used in the chronic stage of stroke rehabilitation. Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports current literature that MT in addition to CT is more effective in improving upper extremity function than CT alone in all stages of stroke rehabilitation. The minimal to moderate effect found in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation suggests that MT in addition to CT is more beneficial in the acute stage of stroke rehabilitation as compared to use in the chronic stage of stroke rehabilitation. The evidence should, however, be interpreted with caution until further studies are included.
590 $a School code: 6050.
650 4 $a Physical therapy. $3 588713
690 $a 0382
710 2 $a California State University, Fresno. $b Physical Therapy. $3 3286130
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-10B.
790 $a 6050
791 $a D.P.T.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13813308