東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Using Response to Intervention to De...

Hunter, Drew W.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder?/
作者:	Hunter, Drew W.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	112 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-10A.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13807554
ISBN:	9781392047460

Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder?
Hunter, Drew W.

Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 112 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.

Thesis (D.Ed.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this study was to examine the dual-discrepancy model (Fuchs & Fuchs, 1998) and its application to the identification of specific learning disabilities (SLD) in reading when using a response to intervention (RTI) decision-making framework. Curriculum-based measurement-reading (CBM-R) data and demographic data were obtained for 163 students in grades two through four from one Mid-Atlantic school district. The data were analyzed to determine if students who were referred for multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) and determined eligible, referred for MDE and determined ineligible, and students who received Tier 3 reading support and were not referred for MDE were different on their level of performance or rate of improvement (ROI) using CBM-R data. The data were also analyzed to determine if level of performance and ROI predicated eligibility for special education more than other student demographic data. The results indicated that students referred for MDE and determined eligible had significantly lower levels of performance than students receiving Tier 3 support and not referred for evaluation. Student ROI was not meaningfully different among the three levels of the dependent variable. The results also revealed that level of performance significantly predicted student eligibility for special education but ROI did not. Implications for research, practice, and policy related to using RTI for SLD eligibility decisions are discussed.

ISBN: 9781392047460Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder?
LDR:02589nmm a2200325 4500 001 2206531
005 20190828120156.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392047460
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13807554
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iup:11827
035 $a AAI13807554
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hunter, Drew W. $3 3433440
245 1 0 $a Using Response to Intervention to Determine Eligibility for Specific Learning Disabilities in Reading: What Determines a Non-responder?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 112 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-10, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Runge, Timothy.
502 $a Thesis (D.Ed.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to examine the dual-discrepancy model (Fuchs & Fuchs, 1998) and its application to the identification of specific learning disabilities (SLD) in reading when using a response to intervention (RTI) decision-making framework. Curriculum-based measurement-reading (CBM-R) data and demographic data were obtained for 163 students in grades two through four from one Mid-Atlantic school district. The data were analyzed to determine if students who were referred for multidisciplinary evaluation (MDE) and determined eligible, referred for MDE and determined ineligible, and students who received Tier 3 reading support and were not referred for MDE were different on their level of performance or rate of improvement (ROI) using CBM-R data. The data were also analyzed to determine if level of performance and ROI predicated eligibility for special education more than other student demographic data. The results indicated that students referred for MDE and determined eligible had significantly lower levels of performance than students receiving Tier 3 support and not referred for evaluation. Student ROI was not meaningfully different among the three levels of the dependent variable. The results also revealed that level of performance significantly predicted student eligibility for special education but ROI did not. Implications for research, practice, and policy related to using RTI for SLD eligibility decisions are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b Educational and School Psychology. $3 1022741
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-10A.
790 $a 0318
791 $a D.Ed.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13807554