東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Comparison of Curriculum Based Mea...

Merrill, Trish.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency./
作者:	Merrill, Trish.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-01A.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10838430
ISBN:	9780438147270

A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency.
Merrill, Trish.

A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 65 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--University of Southern Maine, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Curriculum Based Measurements (CBM) are a widely-used tool for Response to Intervention (RTI) progress monitoring. In addition, they can be used in the determination of learning disabilities and special education qualification. The most widely used type of CBM is a measure of oral reading fluency (ORF). This type involves having a student read out loud for 1 minute while the examiner records any errors. Also known as reading curriculum-based measures (RCBM), various published forms of RCBM have been documented to be reliable and valid measures of all aspects of reading skills. Nonetheless, not all RCBM forms are the same, and the differences in features across published versions could affect student scores. This study examined the textual composition of three different published versions of RCBM probes to determine passage similarity and difficulty. The study also examined the consistency in student reading levels across the RCBM passage sets. A total of 202 students completed three passages from each of the selected probe sets for a total of nine passages each. Results indicated that all RCBM passages were correlated with each other and with a statewide assessment of reading. Mixed results were obtained when analyzing correlations between RCBM and a computer administered universal screening measure in reading. Significant differences were found in the overall number of words read correctly, dependent on the passage set. Significant differences were also noted in the number of students identified as at-risk of reading difficulties or in need of reading intervention based on each of the RCBM passage sets as compared to other standardized tests of reading. Regarding the textual composition of the three versions, passage sets appeared similar when similar length passages were compared, however, descriptive statistics suggested that passage level difficulty may vary depending on the passage within the set.

ISBN: 9780438147270Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.

A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency.
LDR:02986nmm a2200325 4500 001 2206468
005 20190828120142.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438147270
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10838430
035 $a (MiAaPQ)usm:10084
035 $a AAI10838430
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Merrill, Trish. $3 3433373
245 1 0 $a A Comparison of Curriculum Based Measures of Oral Reading Fluency.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-01, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Brown, Rachel.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--University of Southern Maine, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Curriculum Based Measurements (CBM) are a widely-used tool for Response to Intervention (RTI) progress monitoring. In addition, they can be used in the determination of learning disabilities and special education qualification. The most widely used type of CBM is a measure of oral reading fluency (ORF). This type involves having a student read out loud for 1 minute while the examiner records any errors. Also known as reading curriculum-based measures (RCBM), various published forms of RCBM have been documented to be reliable and valid measures of all aspects of reading skills. Nonetheless, not all RCBM forms are the same, and the differences in features across published versions could affect student scores. This study examined the textual composition of three different published versions of RCBM probes to determine passage similarity and difficulty. The study also examined the consistency in student reading levels across the RCBM passage sets. A total of 202 students completed three passages from each of the selected probe sets for a total of nine passages each. Results indicated that all RCBM passages were correlated with each other and with a statewide assessment of reading. Mixed results were obtained when analyzing correlations between RCBM and a computer administered universal screening measure in reading. Significant differences were found in the overall number of words read correctly, dependent on the passage set. Significant differences were also noted in the number of students identified as at-risk of reading difficulties or in need of reading intervention based on each of the RCBM passage sets as compared to other standardized tests of reading. Regarding the textual composition of the three versions, passage sets appeared similar when similar length passages were compared, however, descriptive statistics suggested that passage level difficulty may vary depending on the passage within the set.
590 $a School code: 0563.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a University of Southern Maine. $b College of Education and Human Development. $3 1685462
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-01A.
790 $a 0563
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10838430