東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Point of Equal Access to Justice...

Segatti, Marco.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen./
作者:	Segatti, Marco.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	428 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-08A(E).
標題:	Law. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13805745
ISBN:	9781392019320

The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen.
Segatti, Marco.

The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 428 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (J.S.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2019.

What is the source of Governments' commitments in the administration of justice? Why, and when, should Governments pay for private lawyers? Should actual users of legal services be asked to pay for (at least some of) these costs? How should we identify the relevant costs anyways?

ISBN: 9781392019320Subjects--Topical Terms:

600858
Law.

The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen.
LDR:03133nmm a2200349 4500 001 2203788
005 20190606091703.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392019320
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13805745
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uchicago:14695
035 $a AAI13805745
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Segatti, Marco. $3 3430597
245 1 4 $a The Point of Equal Access to Justice: On the Duty to, at Times and Provisionally, Pause, Cool Down and Listen.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 428 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Tom Ginsburg.
502 $a Thesis (J.S.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2019.
520 $a What is the source of Governments' commitments in the administration of justice? Why, and when, should Governments pay for private lawyers? Should actual users of legal services be asked to pay for (at least some of) these costs? How should we identify the relevant costs anyways?
520 $a Does the protection of equality matter for how we answer these questions? If so, which conception of equality is best suited for understanding its claims in the administration of justice? Which kinds of limits should Governments be authorized to impose on the use of legal services, in order to protect their equal availability?
520 $a These are (some of) the central normative questions in the field of access to justice. Their respective answers directly affect the way we should think about many pressing and urgent political questions.
520 $a This essay argues that the comparative best way to think about these questions is to begin by identifying our moral, pre-political interest, which we all share as humans, in protecting the abilities (or behavioral functions) involved in access to justice. Given the kind of beings that we are (responsive to reasons of various kinds, sociable, and having needy and temporal bodies), we are morally interested in our ability to disagree with others in certain qualified ways. This moral interest is what triggers the recognition of a (moral) duty to, at times, and provisionally, pause, cool down, and listen.
520 $a We ought to demand that Governments pay for the administration of justice, and even pay (at times at least) for private lawyers, because we recognize as morally binding, for ourselves and for others, the reasonable authority of the duty on our activities and interests. This essay further proposes three political principles, which should help one to think well about public intervention the field. We should model public institutions in access to justice as a means to protect people from hierarchical social relations, as a means to protect the epistemic capacities of public institutions, and as a means to express a democratic culture in dispute resolution.
590 $a School code: 0330.
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a The University of Chicago. $b Law. $3 1673717
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-08A(E).
790 $a 0330
791 $a J.S.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13805745