東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Role of Text Difficulty in Small...

Kelly, Laura Beth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students./
作者:	Kelly, Laura Beth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	255 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
標題:	Reading instruction. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10786163
ISBN:	9780355890648

The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students.
Kelly, Laura Beth.

The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 255 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.

How hard should the books be in elementary small-group reading? This study explored text difficulty for bilingual students reading below grade level in third grade. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, I used qualitative methods to analyze students' engagement and discussion during small groups and single case design to evaluate students' fluency and reading comprehension after reading and discussing texts in small groups.

ISBN: 9780355890648Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122756
Reading instruction.

The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students.
LDR:03290nmm a2200361 4500 001 2201811
005 20190503132004.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355890648
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10786163
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17643
035 $a AAI10786163
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kelly, Laura Beth. $3 3428540
245 1 4 $a The Role of Text Difficulty in Small-Group Reading for Bilingual Students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 255 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Margarita Jimenez-Silva; Lindsey Moses.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2018.
520 $a How hard should the books be in elementary small-group reading? This study explored text difficulty for bilingual students reading below grade level in third grade. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods design, I used qualitative methods to analyze students' engagement and discussion during small groups and single case design to evaluate students' fluency and reading comprehension after reading and discussing texts in small groups.
520 $a Six Spanish-English bilingual students, split into two groups of three, participated in twelve, 30-minute, small-group reading sessions. Students in Group 1 read approximately one year below grade level, and students in Group 2 read approximately a year and a half below grade level. In six of the twelve sessions, students read and discussed texts matched to their reading levels, and in the other six they read and discussed texts one year ahead of their reading levels. I assigned matched and difficult texts across the twelve days by blocked randomization.
520 $a I analyzed video transcripts of each session to understand students' engagement (focus of engagement, strategies, and interaction) and discussion (inferential vs. literal responses, instances of verbal participation). At the end of each session, students reread and retold the book the group had read and discussed that day to produce a fluency (words correct per minute) and comprehension (ideas correctly retold) score.
520 $a Findings were complex and revealed that different levels of texts have both advantages and drawbacks. Key findings included: For fluency, half of the students benefited from matched texts. The other half read difficult texts with similar fluency to matched texts. For comprehension, text difficulty did not matter for anyone except one student, and for him it only had an effect on 3 of 12 days. Group 2 engaged much more with texts and ideas in difficult books and with pictures in matched books. Group 1 had more inferential/interpretive responses with matched texts, and Group 2 had more inferential and interpretive responses with difficult texts. Most students participated evenly regardless of the difficulty of the text under discussion. However, two students talked more when discussing matched texts.
590 $a School code: 0010.
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 516208
650 4 $a Bilingual education. $3 2122778
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0282
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Learning, Literacies and Technologies. $3 3342388
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 0010
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10786163