東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Where Does Innovation Come From? Exp...

Fu, Jiawei Sophia.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation./
作者:	Fu, Jiawei Sophia.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	197 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International80-03A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10929106
ISBN:	9780438551619

Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
Fu, Jiawei Sophia.

Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 197 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.

Social entrepreneurship and social innovation have emerged throughout the world as promising solutions to grand challenges such as poverty, environmental degradation, human rights violations, and social exclusion. However, research in social entrepreneurship and social innovation is still in infancy. This dissertation is motivated by one overarching question: How can social entrepreneurs and social ventures more effectively tackle social issues? To answer this question, this dissertation research presents three separate, yet interrelated studies using data gathered from three sources. Drawing on interviews with 53 Chinese social entrepreneurs, the first study uncovers that Chinese social ventures are most struggling with the tensions between the state and social welfare logics, as opposed to the conflict between the market and social welfare logics as suggested in a majority of prior studies. Moreover, the results reveal four strategies, two of which are unique in the authoritarian regime of China, that social ventures employ to manage the conflict between state and social welfare logics. Drawing on survey data with 293 nonprofit organizations in the United States and based on the recombination-based organizational innovation theory, the second study examines the internal and external communicative drivers of organizational innovativeness. Regression and mediation tests reveal two distinct mechanisms underlying administrative and technical innovativeness. Overall, findings highlight the critical role of developing diverse interorganizational partnerships and maintaining a high level of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) to improve administrative and technical innovation. However, using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for knowledge sharing with members in an organization and across organizations are conducive to technical innovation only. Finally, drawing on survey data with 318 nascent nonprofit organizations, social enterprises, and benefit corporations in the U.S., the third study investigates how varied degrees of institutional complexity influence social innovation outcomes. Structural equation modeling results reveal an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between institutional complexity and organizational innovation and that an organization's EO fully mediates the relationship between institutional complexity and organization innovation. Taken together, the findings of the three studies underscore the institutional, network, and organizational factors that influence organizational innovation. The findings of these three studies contribute to theoretical advancement in the study of organizational communication, ICTs, social networks, and organization studies.

ISBN: 9780438551619Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
LDR:03769nmm a2200313 4500 001 2201539
005 20190429104417.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438551619
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10929106
035 $a (MiAaPQ)northwestern:14306
035 $a AAI10929106
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fu, Jiawei Sophia. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-3922-6758 $3 3428257
245 1 0 $a Where Does Innovation Come From? Exploring the Dynamic Processes of Organizing and Managing Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 197 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Michelle D. Shumate.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2018.
520 $a Social entrepreneurship and social innovation have emerged throughout the world as promising solutions to grand challenges such as poverty, environmental degradation, human rights violations, and social exclusion. However, research in social entrepreneurship and social innovation is still in infancy. This dissertation is motivated by one overarching question: How can social entrepreneurs and social ventures more effectively tackle social issues? To answer this question, this dissertation research presents three separate, yet interrelated studies using data gathered from three sources. Drawing on interviews with 53 Chinese social entrepreneurs, the first study uncovers that Chinese social ventures are most struggling with the tensions between the state and social welfare logics, as opposed to the conflict between the market and social welfare logics as suggested in a majority of prior studies. Moreover, the results reveal four strategies, two of which are unique in the authoritarian regime of China, that social ventures employ to manage the conflict between state and social welfare logics. Drawing on survey data with 293 nonprofit organizations in the United States and based on the recombination-based organizational innovation theory, the second study examines the internal and external communicative drivers of organizational innovativeness. Regression and mediation tests reveal two distinct mechanisms underlying administrative and technical innovativeness. Overall, findings highlight the critical role of developing diverse interorganizational partnerships and maintaining a high level of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) to improve administrative and technical innovation. However, using information and communication technologies (ICTs) for knowledge sharing with members in an organization and across organizations are conducive to technical innovation only. Finally, drawing on survey data with 318 nascent nonprofit organizations, social enterprises, and benefit corporations in the U.S., the third study investigates how varied degrees of institutional complexity influence social innovation outcomes. Structural equation modeling results reveal an inverted U-shaped curvilinear relationship between institutional complexity and organizational innovation and that an organization's EO fully mediates the relationship between institutional complexity and organization innovation. Taken together, the findings of the three studies underscore the institutional, network, and organizational factors that influence organizational innovation. The findings of these three studies contribute to theoretical advancement in the study of organizational communication, ICTs, social networks, and organization studies.
590 $a School code: 0163.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a Northwestern University. $b Communication Studies. $3 1022052
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 80-03A(E).
790 $a 0163
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10929106