東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Measuring Organizational Arrogance: ...

Herbin, C. Victor, III.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument./
Author:	Herbin, C. Victor, III.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	142 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
Subject:	Organizational behavior. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825534
ISBN:	9780438003286

Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
Herbin, C. Victor, III.

Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 142 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2018.

This research described the formation of an emerging concept, organizational arrogance, and the development of an instrument designed to measure this organizational behavior phenomenon. This dissertation was completed in response to the established need for empirical evidence examining arrogant behaviors and their negative impact on organizational members and organizations in general. This study defined organizational arrogance as an organizational environment where leaders shaped a culture in which organizational members behaved with a sense of superiority, leading to overconfidence in organizational capabilities, dismissiveness toward internal and external needs, and disparagement of intraorganizational and interorganizational members. Using existing theories, this research developed and validated a 5-item measurement scale for organizational arrogance with a Cronbach alpha of .922, indicating a reliable instrument. Ongoing research reported findings on a variety of factors that played into organizational failure, including level of job satisfaction, employee engagement, morale, workplace stress, organizational culture, and ineffective leadership and followership styles. Findings from this study provided the body of knowledge opportunities for new exploration to gain further understanding of how organizational arrogance and its associated traits contributed to or birth from the dark side of leadership. The practical significance of this study was that it reinforced the idea that organizational culture remained a leader responsibility that required keen attention, astute observations, and immediate action to eliminate any signs of organizational arrogance.

ISBN: 9780438003286Subjects--Topical Terms:

516683
Organizational behavior.

Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
LDR:02666nmm a2200313 4500 001 2201102
005 20190329144319.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438003286
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10825534
035 $a (MiAaPQ)regent:10769
035 $a AAI10825534
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Herbin, C. Victor, III. $3 3427828
245 1 0 $a Measuring Organizational Arrogance: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Instrument.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 142 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: James A. Wood, Jr.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Regent University, 2018.
520 $a This research described the formation of an emerging concept, organizational arrogance, and the development of an instrument designed to measure this organizational behavior phenomenon. This dissertation was completed in response to the established need for empirical evidence examining arrogant behaviors and their negative impact on organizational members and organizations in general. This study defined organizational arrogance as an organizational environment where leaders shaped a culture in which organizational members behaved with a sense of superiority, leading to overconfidence in organizational capabilities, dismissiveness toward internal and external needs, and disparagement of intraorganizational and interorganizational members. Using existing theories, this research developed and validated a 5-item measurement scale for organizational arrogance with a Cronbach alpha of .922, indicating a reliable instrument. Ongoing research reported findings on a variety of factors that played into organizational failure, including level of job satisfaction, employee engagement, morale, workplace stress, organizational culture, and ineffective leadership and followership styles. Findings from this study provided the body of knowledge opportunities for new exploration to gain further understanding of how organizational arrogance and its associated traits contributed to or birth from the dark side of leadership. The practical significance of this study was that it reinforced the idea that organizational culture remained a leader responsibility that required keen attention, astute observations, and immediate action to eliminate any signs of organizational arrogance.
590 $a School code: 1058.
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
690 $a 0703
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0635
710 2 $a Regent University. $b School of Business & Leadership. $3 3171088
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 1058
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10825534