東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Reading Others Well and Being Well Read.

Engel-Hawbecker, Nathan Louis.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Reading Others Well and Being Well Read.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Reading Others Well and Being Well Read./
作者:	Engel-Hawbecker, Nathan Louis.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	65 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-04(E).
標題:	Epistemology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10280807
ISBN:	9781369821888

Reading Others Well and Being Well Read.
Engel-Hawbecker, Nathan Louis.

Reading Others Well and Being Well Read. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 65 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2017.

The conceptual problem of other minds is over how we can so much as form thoughts or beliefs about (let alone know) mental lives other than our own. What I call the conceptual problem of other conscious minds restricts this question to others' phenomenally conscious experiences. Past appeals to an individual's inferential, imaginative, or perceptual faculties all more plausibly presuppose than provide a solution to this problem: such faculties allow us to form thoughts about others' experiences only if we already have some prior means of doing so (§§2-5). This is not the case with testimony, which I introduce and defend as the most plausible solution to the conceptual problem of other conscious minds (§§6-7). I then try to introduce an analogous conceptual problem over others' psychological states to see whether testimony too might solve it (§8). Testimony cannot solve what I call the conceptual problem of other cognitive minds---regarding others' psychological dispositions---but this turns out to be something of a pseudo-problem (§9). What I call the conceptual problem of other people---regarding others' commitments and values---is a significant problem of other minds (§10), and one for which testimony again seems to be the best solution (§11).

ISBN: 9781369821888Subjects--Topical Terms:

896969
Epistemology.

Reading Others Well and Being Well Read.
LDR:02169nmm a2200301 4500 001 2200127
005 20181214114458.5
008 201008s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369821888
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10280807
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uwm:11788
035 $a AAI10280807
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Engel-Hawbecker, Nathan Louis. $0 (orcid)0000-0002-2748-0652 $3 3426874
245 1 0 $a Reading Others Well and Being Well Read.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 65 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-04.
500 $a Adviser: Edward Hinchman.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, 2017.
520 $a The conceptual problem of other minds is over how we can so much as form thoughts or beliefs about (let alone know) mental lives other than our own. What I call the conceptual problem of other conscious minds restricts this question to others' phenomenally conscious experiences. Past appeals to an individual's inferential, imaginative, or perceptual faculties all more plausibly presuppose than provide a solution to this problem: such faculties allow us to form thoughts about others' experiences only if we already have some prior means of doing so (§§2-5). This is not the case with testimony, which I introduce and defend as the most plausible solution to the conceptual problem of other conscious minds (§§6-7). I then try to introduce an analogous conceptual problem over others' psychological states to see whether testimony too might solve it (§8). Testimony cannot solve what I call the conceptual problem of other cognitive minds---regarding others' psychological dispositions---but this turns out to be something of a pseudo-problem (§9). What I call the conceptual problem of other people---regarding others' commitments and values---is a significant problem of other minds (§10), and one for which testimony again seems to be the best solution (§11).
590 $a School code: 0263.
650 4 $a Epistemology. $3 896969
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
690 $a 0393
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. $b Philosophy. $3 3168747
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-04(E).
790 $a 0263
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10280807