東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evide...

Hitchcock-Smith, Olivia Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation./
作者:	Hitchcock-Smith, Olivia Katherine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	32 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-05(E).
標題:	Experimental psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10785658
ISBN:	9780355841602

Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation.
Hitchcock-Smith, Olivia Katherine.

Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 32 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--Arkansas State University, 2018.

Research shows that graphic evidence in the form of visual photographs leads to an increase in guilty verdicts, but other presentation formats, such as auditory (e.g. 911 calls), have not been thoroughly examined. With the technological advances today, it is important to study the effects of modernized evidence. The current research examines the effects of presentation format of evidence (visual or auditory) and evidence content (graphic or nongraphic) on juror opinions regarding the likelihood of defendant guilt. In the four-condition study, 222 participants read an identical trial summary and examined relevant evidence. Results showed that regardless of presentation format, graphic evidence resulted in more guilty verdicts. This suggests that courts should consider graphic evidence cautiously. The present findings can help the justice system gain a better perspective on what type of evidence sways the jury and develop safeguards to prevent admissibility of prejudicial evidence in court.

ISBN: 9780355841602Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144733
Experimental psychology.

Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation.
LDR:01964nmm a2200313 4500 001 2199779
005 20181029135741.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355841602
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10785658
035 $a (MiAaPQ)astate:10575
035 $a AAI10785658
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hitchcock-Smith, Olivia Katherine. $3 3426523
245 1 0 $a Jury Decision Making & Graphic Evidence: The Effects of Auditory vs. Visual Presentation.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 32 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-05.
500 $a Adviser: Christopher S. Peters.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Arkansas State University, 2018.
520 $a Research shows that graphic evidence in the form of visual photographs leads to an increase in guilty verdicts, but other presentation formats, such as auditory (e.g. 911 calls), have not been thoroughly examined. With the technological advances today, it is important to study the effects of modernized evidence. The current research examines the effects of presentation format of evidence (visual or auditory) and evidence content (graphic or nongraphic) on juror opinions regarding the likelihood of defendant guilt. In the four-condition study, 222 participants read an identical trial summary and examined relevant evidence. Results showed that regardless of presentation format, graphic evidence resulted in more guilty verdicts. This suggests that courts should consider graphic evidence cautiously. The present findings can help the justice system gain a better perspective on what type of evidence sways the jury and develop safeguards to prevent admissibility of prejudicial evidence in court.
590 $a School code: 1231.
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 523881
650 4 $a Law. $3 600858
690 $a 0623
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a Arkansas State University. $b Psychology and Counseling. $3 3426524
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-05(E).
790 $a 1231
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10785658