東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Environmental estrogens and vulnerab...

Thomson, Laura Katherine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research./
作者:	Thomson, Laura Katherine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2010,
面頁冊數:	263 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International71-09A.
標題:	Womens studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3390081
ISBN:	9781109579161

Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research.
Thomson, Laura Katherine.

Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2010 - 263 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Francisco, 2010.

This dissertation analyzes the current era of activist-scientist collaborations on environmental causes of breast cancer. The guiding questions are: As women's health organizations in the U.S. are becoming institutionalized within biomedical research, how are these alignments shaping knowledge on women's health? What bearing do the collaborations and products of research have on activist/advocacy organizations? The primary site of data collection was the Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers (BCERC). Beginning in 2003, BCERC is studying how environmental exposures might cause early pubertal onset in girls and breast cancer. It is one of the most collaborative research projects funded by the NIH to date. My data consisted of 22 in-depth interviews with researchers and advocates, observations at conferences and meetings, and a content analysis of 54 newspaper articles from 2005-2008 discussing toxins, early puberty, and breast cancer. Peer-reviewed medical journals and breast cancer advocacy websites supplemented my data. This dissertation is informed by grounded theory and social worlds methodologies, and by situational analysis. I engage biomedicalization, feminist science studies theories, and health social movements, including the growing body of literature on public understandings of science. I observed that the research being produced by scientists and activists is painstaking, slow, and difficult to interpret. As a consequence, the collaborations themselves are being discussed as major contributions, for they can be analyzed and discussed by researchers and advocates as they unfold. My content analysis data highlighted implicit lines of discussion among scientists, advocates, and popular newspapers. Scientists portrayed journalists as popularizing issues without adequately conveying results, and journalists criticized scientists for not providing enough information on avoiding exposures. The content analysis emphasized difficulties in distinguishing inside/outside boundaries in science. The central story of this dissertation follows the advocates as they renegotiate boundaries of expertise and claim recognition as scientific researchers in their own right. As Callon (1999) has argued, when advocacy groups push for and claim roles in shaping research, their collective identities strongly influence the knowledge that becomes co-produced. With the rise of cooperative formats of breast cancer research, new boundaries are being drawn around "what counts" as science.

ISBN: 9781109579161Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122688
Womens studies.

Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research.
LDR:03630nmm a2200337 4500 001 2197589
005 20190923134349.5
008 200811s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781109579161
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3390081
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ucsf:10221
035 $a AAI3390081
035 $a 2197589
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Thomson, Laura Katherine. $3 3422419
245 1 0 $a Environmental estrogens and vulnerable bodies: A sociological analysis of activist -initiated collaborative research.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2010
300 $a 263 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 71-09, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Clarke, Adele E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, San Francisco, 2010.
520 $a This dissertation analyzes the current era of activist-scientist collaborations on environmental causes of breast cancer. The guiding questions are: As women's health organizations in the U.S. are becoming institutionalized within biomedical research, how are these alignments shaping knowledge on women's health? What bearing do the collaborations and products of research have on activist/advocacy organizations? The primary site of data collection was the Breast Cancer and the Environment Research Centers (BCERC). Beginning in 2003, BCERC is studying how environmental exposures might cause early pubertal onset in girls and breast cancer. It is one of the most collaborative research projects funded by the NIH to date. My data consisted of 22 in-depth interviews with researchers and advocates, observations at conferences and meetings, and a content analysis of 54 newspaper articles from 2005-2008 discussing toxins, early puberty, and breast cancer. Peer-reviewed medical journals and breast cancer advocacy websites supplemented my data. This dissertation is informed by grounded theory and social worlds methodologies, and by situational analysis. I engage biomedicalization, feminist science studies theories, and health social movements, including the growing body of literature on public understandings of science. I observed that the research being produced by scientists and activists is painstaking, slow, and difficult to interpret. As a consequence, the collaborations themselves are being discussed as major contributions, for they can be analyzed and discussed by researchers and advocates as they unfold. My content analysis data highlighted implicit lines of discussion among scientists, advocates, and popular newspapers. Scientists portrayed journalists as popularizing issues without adequately conveying results, and journalists criticized scientists for not providing enough information on avoiding exposures. The content analysis emphasized difficulties in distinguishing inside/outside boundaries in science. The central story of this dissertation follows the advocates as they renegotiate boundaries of expertise and claim recognition as scientific researchers in their own right. As Callon (1999) has argued, when advocacy groups push for and claim roles in shaping research, their collective identities strongly influence the knowledge that becomes co-produced. With the rise of cooperative formats of breast cancer research, new boundaries are being drawn around "what counts" as science.
590 $a School code: 0034.
650 4 $a Womens studies. $3 2122688
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a University of California, San Francisco. $b Sociology. $3 1029451
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 71-09A.
790 $a 0034
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3390081