東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Resp...

DeShields, Inte'a A.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric./
Author:	DeShields, Inte'a A.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
Description:	301 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
Subject:	Rhetoric. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811963
ISBN:	9780438003095

Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
DeShields, Inte'a A.

Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 301 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2018.

On March 26, 2014, for the first time in intercollegiate competitive debate history, two African American women won top honors and named champions of the Cross-Examination Debate Associations national tournament. Using this incident, this dissertation explores the press reports published about this historic moment. Through a collection of 19 artifacts, this dissertation demonstrates how American culture emboldens the white gaze to impose a culture of cultural oppression, and intellectual repression of Black thought while victimizing Western culture, toward the erasure of the celebration of Black women. This rhetorical analysis considers the 2014 Cross-Examination Debate Associations final tournament outcome to explore press reports as an exemplary case of how American cultural standardization edifies the white gaze and its rage in reaction to Black rhetoric.

ISBN: 9780438003095Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.

Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
LDR:02925nmm a2200313 4500 001 2164841
005 20181127124955.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438003095
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10811963
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umbc:11828
035 $a AAI10811963
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DeShields, Inte'a A. $3 3352895
245 1 0 $a Spitfire: Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 301 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Craig Saper.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2018.
520 $a On March 26, 2014, for the first time in intercollegiate competitive debate history, two African American women won top honors and named champions of the Cross-Examination Debate Associations national tournament. Using this incident, this dissertation explores the press reports published about this historic moment. Through a collection of 19 artifacts, this dissertation demonstrates how American culture emboldens the white gaze to impose a culture of cultural oppression, and intellectual repression of Black thought while victimizing Western culture, toward the erasure of the celebration of Black women. This rhetorical analysis considers the 2014 Cross-Examination Debate Associations final tournament outcome to explore press reports as an exemplary case of how American cultural standardization edifies the white gaze and its rage in reaction to Black rhetoric.
520 $a Pulling from Whiteness Studies, this dissertation presents a history of intercollegiate competitive debate alongside a history of the development of American culture to frame unmarked whiteness as problematic. Citing this historic moment, this project notes much of the media response to the tournament outcome presented critiques of the debater's arguments and speech style and focused on the male debaters, toward the erasure the women who were the champions.
520 $a This project uses exnomination, abstract liberalism, American Africanism, and cooptation to frame the rhetoric of whiteness as rage and demonstrates how this rage acts as a violent terror tactic that passively and aggressively coopted the Debater's strategic use of the "n-word" to create symbolic dissention that elevates the Black male debaters while simultaneously silencing and erasing the Black women debaters. It is the goal of this project to demonstrate how whiteness operates in reporting of this historic moment, and to exonerate the women who, through the rhetorical violence of white rage, were virtually erased in the process.
590 $a School code: 0434.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a University of Maryland, Baltimore County. $b Language Literacy and Culture. $3 3174607
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
790 $a 0434
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811963