東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Student Body Presidents and Institut...

Snyder, Robert Scott.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence./
作者:	Snyder, Robert Scott.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	211 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03A(E).
標題:	Higher education administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637926
ISBN:	9780355492897

Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence.
Snyder, Robert Scott.

Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 211 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2018.

The purpose of this study was to understand and perceive how student leaders, and specifically student body presidents, navigated social power and used influence with institutional leaders in the higher education decision-making environment to achieve the goals and objectives of their presidencies. The foundational texts of higher education governance and the literature on decision-making are unclear about or do not acknowledge the role of students as leaders. Meanwhile, the popular press makes it clear students are playing a role in decision-making, and there is growing student consumerism and activism within institutions. The contrast between the foundational texts and the literature on decision-making versus what is occurring with respect to student leader involvement describes the problems of practice and research this study addressed.

ISBN: 9780355492897Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122863
Higher education administration.

Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence.
LDR:03342nmm a2200325 4500 001 2164437
005 20181106103643.5
008 190424s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355492897
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10637926
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gwu:13836
035 $a AAI10637926
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Snyder, Robert Scott. $3 3352488
245 1 0 $a Student Body Presidents and Institutional Leaders: Navigating Power and Influence.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 211 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Roger Whitaker.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2018.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to understand and perceive how student leaders, and specifically student body presidents, navigated social power and used influence with institutional leaders in the higher education decision-making environment to achieve the goals and objectives of their presidencies. The foundational texts of higher education governance and the literature on decision-making are unclear about or do not acknowledge the role of students as leaders. Meanwhile, the popular press makes it clear students are playing a role in decision-making, and there is growing student consumerism and activism within institutions. The contrast between the foundational texts and the literature on decision-making versus what is occurring with respect to student leader involvement describes the problems of practice and research this study addressed.
520 $a This study applied French and Raven's (1959) bases of social power to the experiences of student leaders, and specifically student body presidents, and situated these experiences in the higher education decision-making environment. The primary research question for this study was: How do former student body presidents at colleges and universities perceive navigating social power and using influence with institutional leaders to achieve the stated goals and objectives of their presidencies? There were two secondary research questions: 1) What do former student body presidents perceive to be the principal sources of support in achieving their stated goals and objectives? 2) What do former student body presidents perceive to be the principal sources of challenge to achieving their stated goals and objectives?
520 $a The conclusions of this study related to: (a) the utility and accessibility of, and relationship between, the various bases of power with respect to the ability of the former student body presidents to navigate power and use influence to achieve their goals and objectives; (b) the availability and impact of support on the ability of the student body presidents to achieve their goals and objectives; (c) the impact of challenges on the ability of the student body presidents to achieve their goals and objectives. Along with these conclusions, the study provided recommendations related to theory, practice for both institutional leaders and student leaders, and future research.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Higher education administration. $3 2122863
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 529436
690 $a 0446
690 $a 0449
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Higher Education Administration. $3 1020745
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03A(E).
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10637926