東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A World of Our Own: Climate Change A...

Howard-Williams, Rowan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene./
作者:	Howard-Williams, Rowan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	293 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10638173
ISBN:	9780355618778

A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
Howard-Williams, Rowan.

A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 293 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.

The effects of human impacts on the environment are often not comprehensible to people and have to be given meaning through communication. Such impacts, most prominently climate change, have increased to the extent that human actions are the dominant force in planetary biophysical systems. Yet these impacts are for the most part unintentional and not subject to democratic control. A critical discourse analysis of campaign material and media content examines how three advocacy groups -- 350, a climate activist organization, The Breakthrough Institute, a think-tank, and The Nature Conservancy, an established conservation organization -- discursively construct climate change. The three groups acknowledge the need to more consciously or deliberatively manage environmental impacts, and yet all have very different assumptions, objectives and tactics in their advocacy. Analysis of the communication activities of the organizations and how their ideas are represented and contested in other media shows not only how they construct the particular issue of climate change but their relationship to societal power relationships. How the organizations build their case for action involves discursive acts which define or re-define the boundaries between nature and society and what (and who) is to be included or excluded from political concern. Unless directly challenged, these new formations will reproduce existing power structures and inequalities.

ISBN: 9780355618778Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.

A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
LDR:02418nmm a2200313 4500 001 2164317
005 20181106104112.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355618778
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10638173
035 $a (MiAaPQ)upenngdas:13032
035 $a AAI10638173
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Howard-Williams, Rowan. $3 3352362
245 1 2 $a A World of Our Own: Climate Change Advocacy in the Anthropocene.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 293 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Marwan M. Kraidy.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
520 $a The effects of human impacts on the environment are often not comprehensible to people and have to be given meaning through communication. Such impacts, most prominently climate change, have increased to the extent that human actions are the dominant force in planetary biophysical systems. Yet these impacts are for the most part unintentional and not subject to democratic control. A critical discourse analysis of campaign material and media content examines how three advocacy groups -- 350, a climate activist organization, The Breakthrough Institute, a think-tank, and The Nature Conservancy, an established conservation organization -- discursively construct climate change. The three groups acknowledge the need to more consciously or deliberatively manage environmental impacts, and yet all have very different assumptions, objectives and tactics in their advocacy. Analysis of the communication activities of the organizations and how their ideas are represented and contested in other media shows not only how they construct the particular issue of climate change but their relationship to societal power relationships. How the organizations build their case for action involves discursive acts which define or re-define the boundaries between nature and society and what (and who) is to be included or excluded from political concern. Unless directly challenged, these new formations will reproduce existing power structures and inequalities.
590 $a School code: 0175.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Climate change. $2 bicssc $3 2079509
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0404
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Communication. $3 2093114
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
790 $a 0175
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10638173