東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Presidential Debates Through the Pos...

Epwene, Beatrice N.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012./
Author:	Epwene, Beatrice N.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
Description:	143 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
Subject:	Mass communication. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10642971
ISBN:	9780355516098

Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012.
Epwene, Beatrice N.

Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 143 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2017.

This dissertation content-analyzed a sample of presidential debate transcripts from 1960-2012, to examine and measure the extent to which policy discussions and candidates' stances during debates reflect the aspirations of posterity. A fundamental American socio-cultural frame asserts that people desire that succeeding generations live better lives than their forebears. Though researchers agree that present day decisions and policies will have perhaps greater consequences on posterity than even on present times, the analysis in this dissertation indicated apathy in engaging in long-term policy stances, because they appear to interfere with candidates' short-term political interests.

ISBN: 9780355516098Subjects--Topical Terms:

2144804
Mass communication.

Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012.
LDR:03530nmm a2200361 4500 001 2164005
005 20181026115417.5
008 190424s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355516098
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10642971
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iup:11652
035 $a AAI10642971
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Epwene, Beatrice N. $3 3352032
245 1 0 $a Presidential Debates Through the Posterity Lens: A Content Analysis of Policy Frames in U.S. Presidential Debates from 1960-2012.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 143 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mary Beth Leidman.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2017.
520 $a This dissertation content-analyzed a sample of presidential debate transcripts from 1960-2012, to examine and measure the extent to which policy discussions and candidates' stances during debates reflect the aspirations of posterity. A fundamental American socio-cultural frame asserts that people desire that succeeding generations live better lives than their forebears. Though researchers agree that present day decisions and policies will have perhaps greater consequences on posterity than even on present times, the analysis in this dissertation indicated apathy in engaging in long-term policy stances, because they appear to interfere with candidates' short-term political interests.
520 $a As a consequence, even though the analysis indicated intensely negative sentiments in discussions of issues relating to posterity, candidates seemed oblivious of how their decisions could impact future lives and how future people will evaluate policies discussed and enacted today. Candidates seemed to make no conscious nor firm commitments to safeguarding posterity interests on the debate stage.
520 $a The analysis also revealed that thematic frames, such as the environment and education, identified to be of utmost importance in securing prosperity for posterity, only received marginal treatment within the sampled corpus and featured less in policy discussions. Thus, though the United States is ever marching forward to becoming "a fairer union," the governing elite do not consciously extend that fairness to generations ahead in time.
520 $a This dissertation found that that there are few enduring commitments to long-term future policies in the policy arena today. Thus, future people could be imperiled as matters deemed crucial to their well-being are marginalized in public discourse. These findings should be particularly troubling to futurists, considering that the sampled debates span close to a half century of policy discussions. The findings also indicated that futurists must redouble their efforts and seek allies in high places in the political realm, if the socio-cultural frame of preparing for posterity is to become a reality.
520 $a The study outlined seminal communication concepts upheld through the research, especially as it contributes in furthering understanding of media effects and understanding presidential debates as a policy discussion forum. It discussed some limitations and suggested trajectories for future research.
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Mass communication. $3 2144804
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Sustainability. $3 1029978
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0640
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b Communications Media. $3 3277407
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10642971